GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5: Which AI model is best?

Kenneth Pangan
Written by

Kenneth Pangan

Amogh Sarda
Reviewed by

Amogh Sarda

Last edited October 20, 2025

Expert Verified

Trying to keep up with AI news can feel like drinking from a firehose. Just when you think you've got a handle on things, a new model drops that promises to be smarter, faster, and more capable than the last. Right now, the conversation is buzzing about three heavyweights: OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo, Anthropic's Claude 3, and Google's Gemini 1.5.

They're all incredibly powerful, but choosing the right one isn't as simple as just picking the winner off a leaderboard. Your best bet really depends on what you need it to do, whether that's crunching complex logic, writing with a human touch, or digging through mountains of data.

In this post, we'll give you a clear, data-driven look at how these top models stack up. More importantly, we'll get into why the model itself is only one part of the equation. The real challenge for any business is connecting that raw brainpower to your specific workflows and company knowledge.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5: A quick introduction to the contenders

Before we get into a head-to-head comparison, let's do a quick roll call. Each of these models comes from a different background and was built with a slightly different philosophy, which is pretty interesting.

What is GPT-4 Turbo?

GPT-4 Turbo is the flagship model from OpenAI, the company that really kicked off the current generative AI craze with ChatGPT. You can think of it as the high-IQ workhorse of the group. It's known for its powerful logical reasoning, top-notch coding skills, and general all-around usefulness. When you have a complex, multi-step problem that needs a reliable answer, GPT-4 is often the first one people turn to.

What is Claude 3?

Claude 3 is the latest family of models from Anthropic, a company founded by ex-OpenAI researchers who put a big emphasis on AI safety. If GPT-4 is the "high-IQ" model, then Claude 3 (especially its top-tier version, Opus) is the "high-EQ" one. People often point out its natural, human-like conversational style and its talent for creative writing. It was designed from the ground up to be helpful, harmless, and more in line with human values.

What is Gemini 1.5?

Gemini 1.5 Pro is Google's powerhouse model, and it was designed from day one to be "natively multimodal." What that means is it's not just a text model with other senses bolted on; it was built to understand and reason across different kinds of information, like text, images, and audio, all at the same time. Its biggest party trick is a massive context window, which lets it process and analyze huge amounts of information in a single go.

Performance and intelligence: A look at the benchmarks

One of the most common ways to compare AI models is to see how they do on standardized tests, or benchmarks. These tests measure how well a model can handle things like grade-school math problems, writing code, or answering general knowledge questions.

While benchmarks are a useful starting point, they definitely don't tell the whole story. A model can ace a test but still feel stiff and robotic in a real conversation.

Reddit
As one Reddit user pointed out when comparing models, sometimes a model's 'personality' and writing style can matter just as much as its raw test scores.

Here’s how the top models stack up on a few key benchmarks:

BenchmarkTaskGPT-4 TurboClaude 3 OpusGemini 1.5 Pro
MMLUGeneral Knowledge & Problem Solving~90%~90.1%~85.9%
GSM8KGrade-School Math~92%~90.7%~91.1%
HumanEvalCode Generation~74%~73%~71.9%
Needle In A HaystackLong Context RecallHighNear-perfectHigh

As you can see, it's a really tight race. The models are breathing down each other's necks, and each one has moments where it shines. GPT-4 Turbo tends to pull ahead in complex reasoning and coding, while Claude 3 Opus shows off its near-perfect memory over long documents, making it a star for analysis and summarization.

But again, raw intelligence is just the beginning. For something like customer support, all that brainpower needs to be focused. An off-the-shelf model doesn't know your company's return policy, shipping process, or brand voice. An AI platform like eesel AI closes this gap by connecting these powerful models to your unique business context. It learns from your past support tickets, help center articles, and internal documents, turning a generalist AI into a specialist for your team.

An infographic illustrating how eesel AI centralizes knowledge from different sources to power support automation, relevant to the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 comparison.::
An infographic illustrating how eesel AI centralizes knowledge from different sources to power support automation, relevant to the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 comparison.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5: Comparing core capabilities

Beyond test scores, a model's practical features are what really determine how you can use it in a business setting. Let's break down three of the most important ones: context window, multimodality, and speed.

Context window: Who can remember the most?

The "context window" is basically the AI's short-term memory, or the amount of information it can juggle at one time. A bigger context window is a huge deal for business tasks like analyzing a long financial report, summarizing a customer's entire support history, or understanding a whole codebase.

Here's how they compare:

  • GPT-4 Turbo: 128,000 tokens (which is around 100,000 words or 250 pages of text).

  • Claude 3: 200,000 tokens (around 150,000 words or 375 pages).

  • Gemini 1.5 Pro: 1,000,000 tokens (a massive 750,000 words or about 1,875 pages).

Gemini 1.5 Pro is the clear winner here, capable of digesting entire novels or huge datasets in one sitting.

Multimodality: More than just text

"Multimodality" just means an AI can understand things other than text, like images, audio, and video. This is becoming a bigger and bigger deal for businesses. For example, a customer might send a screenshot of an error, or a technician in the field might send a video of a broken part.

All three models have solid multimodal skills, but Gemini 1.5 was designed this way from the start. This gives it a potential edge in understanding how different types of data fit together. GPT-4o (a successor to Turbo) and Gemini 1.5 Pro are currently leading the pack in their ability to process audio and video.

Of course, having these capabilities is one thing; putting them to good use is another. To be actually helpful for support, an AI needs to be connected to the places where this information lives. eesel AI offers over 100 one-click integrations with platforms like Zendesk, Confluence, and Slack. This makes sure your AI has all the right info, whether it's text from a wiki, images from past tickets, or data from internal docs, to solve problems correctly.

A screenshot of an eesel AI agent answering a team member's question directly in Slack, demonstrating the practical application of AI in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 debate.::
A screenshot of an eesel AI agent answering a team member's question directly in Slack, demonstrating the practical application of AI in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 debate.

Speed and response time

For anything happening in real-time, like a customer-facing chatbot or a tool that suggests replies for your agents, speed is king. A slow, laggy response can frustrate customers and drag your team's productivity down. Based on user feedback and performance tests, Gemini 1.5 Pro and the Claude 3 family (especially the lightweight Haiku model) often feel faster than GPT-4 Turbo when generating text.

Pricing and accessibility: What's the real cost?

For any business thinking about using AI at scale, cost is obviously a huge factor. The pricing for these models is usually based on "tokens," which are basically pieces of words. You get charged for the tokens you send in your prompt and the tokens the AI sends back in its response.

Here’s a quick look at the API pricing per 1 million tokens, which is the standard way they're compared:

ModelInput Cost (per 1M tokens)Output Cost (per 1M tokens)
GPT-4 Turbo$10.00$30.00
Claude 3 Opus$15.00$75.00
Claude 3 Sonnet$3.00$15.00
Claude 3 Haiku$0.25$1.25
Gemini 1.5 Pro$7.00$21.00

The price differences are pretty stark. Claude 3 Opus is a premium model with a price to match, while something like Claude 3 Haiku is incredibly cheap for what it can do.

But the token price is only part of the story. If you try to build your own AI solution from scratch, you're looking at a huge investment in developer salaries, cloud infrastructure, and constant maintenance. The model's sticker price is just the tip of the iceberg.

This is where a managed AI platform can save you a ton of headache and money. eesel AI has straightforward pricing plans that bundle everything together: the AI model costs, the integrations, a powerful workflow engine, and an easy-to-use interface. Unlike competitors that might charge you unpredictable per-resolution fees that can spike when you're busy, eesel's plans are based on usage. This gives you total control over your budget with no nasty surprises at the end of the month.

A visual of the eesel AI pricing page, showing clear, public-facing costs, which is a key consideration in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 analysis.::
A visual of the eesel AI pricing page, showing clear, public-facing costs, which is a key consideration in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 analysis.

Choosing a winner is just the first step

So, which model should you choose? Based on everything we've covered, here's a quick rundown:

  • GPT-4 Turbo is a great pick for complex reasoning, technical stuff, and coding.

  • Claude 3 really shines at nuanced, human-like conversation and creative writing.

  • Gemini 1.5 Pro is the king of the hill when it comes to handling massive, multimodal datasets.

But here’s the most important thing to remember: these models are like powerful, raw engines. To actually use them for something specific like customer support, you have to build the rest of the car around them. You need the steering, the dashboard, and the safety features. You need a way to connect that engine to your company's knowledge, set the rules for how it should behave, and plug it into the tools your team already uses every day.

This is exactly the gap that platforms like eesel AI are designed to fill. It provides the application layer that lets you tap into the power of these models inside your existing workflows, without needing a whole team of developers. With a truly self-serve setup, you can be up and running in minutes, not months.

A workflow diagram illustrating how eesel AI automates the customer support process, which is a practical application of the models discussed in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 comparison.::
A workflow diagram illustrating how eesel AI automates the customer support process, which is a practical application of the models discussed in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 comparison.

From raw power to practical application

The fierce competition in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 vs Gemini 1.5 debate is a clear sign of just how far AI has come. The speed of innovation is mind-boggling. But for businesses, the real win isn't about picking the "best" model from a list. It's about successfully using that power to solve real-world problems.

The future of AI in business isn't just about the model humming away under the hood; it's about the platforms that make these incredible tools accessible, controllable, and secure. It's about turning all that raw potential into practical, everyday results.

Ready to turn raw AI power into real results for your support team? Explore how eesel AI can automate your frontline support today.

Frequently asked questions

Benchmarks offer a useful starting point, but they don't tell the whole story. GPT-4 Turbo often leads in complex reasoning and coding, while Claude 3 Opus shows near-perfect long-context recall, and Gemini 1.5 Pro excels with large datasets. Real-world performance can also depend on factors like a model's "personality" and writing style, which benchmarks don't always capture.

The context window determines how much information an AI can process at once. Gemini 1.5 Pro boasts a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, far surpassing GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 and Claude 3's 200,000 tokens. This larger capacity is crucial for business tasks involving the analysis or summarization of massive documents or extensive customer histories.

Gemini 1.5 Pro was designed from the ground up for multimodality, meaning it understands and reasons across text, images, and audio natively. While GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3 also offer multimodal capabilities, Gemini 1.5 Pro often has an edge in integrating these different data types seamlessly. GPT-4o (a successor to Turbo) also leads in audio/video processing.

Pricing for these models is typically based on "tokens," which are pieces of words, charged for both input prompts and AI-generated responses. Claude 3 Opus is a premium option, while Claude 3 Haiku offers a very cost-effective alternative. GPT-4 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Pro fall in a mid-range, with Gemini often being more competitive for its comprehensive capabilities.

GPT-4 Turbo is highly recommended for complex reasoning, technical problem-solving, and coding tasks due to its powerful logical capabilities. It's often the go-to choice when reliable answers for multi-step problems or intricate code generation are critical.

For real-time applications like customer-facing chatbots, speed is paramount. Based on user feedback and performance tests, Gemini 1.5 Pro and the lighter Claude 3 models (especially Haiku) often demonstrate faster response times and feel more responsive than GPT-4 Turbo when generating text.

Choosing a model is only the first step; businesses need to integrate that raw AI power into their specific workflows and company knowledge. A platform like eesel AI connects these powerful models to your internal documents and existing tools, transforming a generalist AI into a specialized assistant tailored to your team's unique needs and processes.

Share this post

Kenneth undefined

Article by

Kenneth Pangan

Writer and marketer for over ten years, Kenneth Pangan splits his time between history, politics, and art with plenty of interruptions from his dogs demanding attention.