AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions: What to use for AI agents in 2025

Kenneth Pangan
Written by

Kenneth Pangan

Stanley Nicholas
Reviewed by

Stanley Nicholas

Last edited October 20, 2025

Expert Verified

The world of AI assistants is moving at lightning speed. One minute we had simple chatbots, and the next, we have powerful agents that can actually do stuff. But with OpenAI throwing around names like AgentKit, GPTs, and Actions, it’s completely understandable if you’re a bit lost on what’s what and which tool your business actually needs.

Picking the wrong tool can mean wasted time, surprise developer costs, and an AI agent that just doesn’t deliver. Before you sink resources into a project, you really need to get the lay of the land and understand the difference between building an agent from the ground up and deploying a solution that’s ready for business.

This guide will break down AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions in simple, no-fluff terms. We’ll look at what they are, who they’re for, and their biggest drawbacks, so you can make a smart choice for your team.

AgentKit, GPTs, and Actions: A quick breakdown

First off, let's get one thing straight. These aren't three separate products fighting for the top spot. Think of them more like steps on a ladder, showing how building AI agents has evolved. Here’s what each one actually is.

What are GPTs? The original custom chatbots

GPTs (or Custom GPTs) were OpenAI's first shot at letting anyone create their own version of ChatGPT. You can feed them custom instructions, give them a unique personality, and upload documents for them to use as a knowledge base.

They're perfect for whipping up a personal assistant or a simple Q&A bot for your team. But when it comes to serious business tasks like customer support, they just don't have the muscle. They’re missing the deep integrations, memory, and controls you'd need for anything mission-critical.

What are Actions? The bridge to the outside world

Actions aren't a standalone thing you can buy; they're a capability. They are the API connectors that let GPTs and other AI agents talk to other systems. Think of them as the arms and legs for your AI. They’re what lets an agent do things, like book a meeting, check an order status in Shopify, or create a ticket in Zendesk. Actions are the essential plumbing that turns a chatbot that just talks into an agent that works.

What is AgentKit? The full developer toolkit

AgentKit is OpenAI's new, heavy-duty toolkit for developers who want to build, deploy, and manage production-ready AI agents from scratch. It comes with a visual canvas (Agent Builder) to map out workflows, ready-made UI components (ChatKit), and tools for testing performance. It’s basically a full-blown workshop for developers, but it’s absolutely not a ready-to-go solution for your support or IT team.

Core differences: A head-to-head comparison

Now that we have a handle on what each component does, let's put them side-by-side and see how they stack up on the things that really matter to a business: who they're for, how easy they are to use, and how much control you actually get.

Target users: Who are they built for?

  • GPTs: These are for individuals, hobbyists, or teams who want to play around with ideas quickly. The whole point is to make it easy to build something simple without a big fuss.

  • AgentKit: This is built for Python developers and engineering teams, period. It gives them all the parts they need to construct complex, custom agents, but it assumes you have the technical firepower to build, integrate, and maintain it all.

  • The Business-Ready Alternative: But what if you're on a support, IT, or ops team and just need a powerful AI agent that works, without having to write a single line of code? That’s where a platform like eesel AI comes in. It’s designed so that anyone can build and launch a professional-grade AI agent that plugs right into their help desk and knowledge sources.

Ease of use and setup

  • GPTs: Super simple. The setup feels like you’re just having a conversation, and you can get a basic GPT up and running in a few minutes with zero code.

  • AgentKit: This is a different beast altogether. Even with a visual builder, you're still deep in the weeds of APIs, authentication, and complex logic. This isn't a weekend project; it's a full-on development effort.

  • The Seamless Alternative: This is where tools designed for a specific job really shine. For instance, eesel AI has one-click integrations with help desks like Zendesk and Freshdesk. You can be up and running in minutes, not months, because it’s designed to plug right into the tools you already use. No need to bother your dev team.

This workflow shows how a business-ready platform like eesel AI integrates directly with helpdesks to automate support tickets as discussed in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions comparison.
This workflow shows how a business-ready platform like eesel AI integrates directly with helpdesks to automate support tickets as discussed in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions comparison.

Customization and control

  • GPTs: Your control is pretty limited. You can set the initial instructions and upload some documents, but you can't really dictate specific multi-step processes or manage how it handles tricky situations.

  • AgentKit: For developers, it offers incredible control. You can code any logic you can dream of, but that freedom comes with the responsibility of building and maintaining every single piece yourself.

  • Control Without Complexity: A much better path for most businesses is a platform that gives you guided customization. With eesel AI, you’re in the driver’s seat. You can use a simple editor to set your agent's persona, decide exactly which tickets it should work on, and define custom actions, like looking up order details or assigning a ticket, all from a straightforward dashboard.

This image shows the eesel AI dashboard where users can set custom rules and persona, highlighting the platform's control-without-complexity approach in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions discussion.
This image shows the eesel AI dashboard where users can set custom rules and persona, highlighting the platform's control-without-complexity approach in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions discussion.

Practical applications and limitations

Okay, that's the theory. But how do these things actually stack up in a real-world scenario? Let's look at what they're good for and, more importantly, where they don't quite cut it for business automation.

Common use cases

  • GPTs:

    • A personal helper to summarize your meeting notes.

    • An internal bot trained on a handful of product guides.

    • A brainstorming buddy for coming up with marketing ideas.

  • AgentKit:

    • A custom travel agent that can connect to flight, hotel, and rental car APIs.

    • An internal DevOps tool that can run scripts and check on system health.

    • A sophisticated customer-facing agent for a tech product with deep API needs.

Key limitations and where they fall short

  • GPTs: Honestly, you wouldn't want to put a standard GPT in front of your customers. They're just not reliable enough. There's no real way to test them, no version control, and they struggle to piece together information from different places to solve real problems.

  • AgentKit: It’s a generic box of tools. It doesn't come with any of the specialized features a support or IT team desperately needs. You’re on your own to build the logic for escalations, the ability to learn from past tickets, and the analytics to track how it's doing. You also become completely dependent on the OpenAI ecosystem.

  • The Business-Specific Solution: This is exactly what platforms like eesel AI are built to fix.

    • It learns from your real-world data: eesel AI gets up to speed by training on your past support tickets, so it understands your company’s voice and knows your common solutions right away.

    • It lets you test with confidence: Before you flip the switch, you can run simulations on thousands of your old tickets. This shows you exactly how the AI will behave and gives you a solid forecast of your automation rate. Generic toolkits just can't offer this kind of risk-free testing.

This screenshot of the eesel AI simulation feature shows how businesses can test AI performance, a key advantage when comparing AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions.
This screenshot of the eesel AI simulation feature shows how businesses can test AI performance, a key advantage when comparing AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions.

Pricing and scalability: What's the real cost?

Cost is always a big deal, especially when you want to scale. The way these tools are priced can make or break your budget.

The OpenAI model: GPTs and AgentKit pricing

  • GPTs: Using and creating GPTs is usually bundled into a paid ChatGPT subscription (like Plus or Team).

  • AgentKit: The final pricing isn't out yet, but it's expected to follow the typical OpenAI model, which means you pay based on token consumption. For any business, this is a huge headache. Your bill is a moving target. If you have a busy support month, you could get hit with a massive, unexpected invoice. Good luck trying to budget for that.

A screenshot of the OpenAI API pricing page, illustrating the token-based consumption model that affects AgentKit pricing in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions analysis.
A screenshot of the OpenAI API pricing page, illustrating the token-based consumption model that affects AgentKit pricing in the AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions analysis.

The business-friendly alternative: eesel AI's pricing

On the other hand, eesel AI's pricing is transparent and predictable because it’s made for businesses. The plans are based on a fixed number of AI interactions per month, so your bill is the same every time. No surprises.

And importantly, there are no per-resolution fees. You don't get punished for having a successful month where you automate a lot of tickets. This model actually supports your business goals instead of creating unpredictable costs.

PlanMonthly (bill monthly)Effective /mo AnnualBotsAI Interactions/moKey Unlocks
Team$299$239Up to 3Up to 1,000Train on website/docs; Copilot for help desk; Slack; reports.
Business$799$639UnlimitedUp to 3,000Everything in Team + train on past tickets; MS Teams; AI Actions (triage/API calls); bulk simulation; EU data residency.
CustomContact SalesCustomUnlimitedUnlimitedAdvanced actions; multi‑agent orchestration; custom integrations; custom data retention; advanced security / controls.

Choosing the right tool for the job

So, what's the verdict? The choice between AgentKit vs GPTs vs Actions isn't really about which tool is "best." It’s about picking the right tool for what you’re trying to accomplish.

  • GPTs are for quick, personal AI experiments.

  • AgentKit is a professional workshop for developer teams building something completely custom from the ground up.

  • Actions are the engine parts that let these agents interact with the world.

But for most businesses, especially if you're in customer service, IT, or operations, building an agent from scratch is a long, expensive, and frankly, risky road. What you really need is something that works right out of the box, powerful, easy to manage, and ready to help from day one.

FeatureCustom GPTsOpenAI AgentKiteesel AI
Primary UserIndividuals & EnthusiastsDevelopers & Technical TeamsSupport, IT & Business Teams
Setup TimeMinutesWeeks or MonthsMinutes
Key Use CasePersonal productivityCustom, complex agent buildsHelp desk & internal support automation
Pricing ModelFlat subscriptionUsage-based (tokens)Predictable monthly/annual fee
Business-Ready?NoRequires developmentYes, out of the box

Get started with AI agents that actually work for your business

Instead of starting from zero with a developer toolkit, you could deploy a production-ready AI support agent in minutes. eesel AI connects with all your existing tools, learns from your team's past conversations, and gives you the control you need to automate confidently.

Ready to see how it works? Start your free trial today.

Frequently asked questions

For a small business without development resources, a business-ready platform like eesel AI is highly recommended. While GPTs are too basic and AgentKit requires significant developer effort, eesel AI offers out-of-the-box integrations and a no-code setup for rapid deployment to automate customer support.

GPTs are typically part of a flat ChatGPT subscription. AgentKit is expected to follow a usage-based token consumption model, leading to unpredictable costs. In contrast, solutions like eesel AI offer predictable monthly or annual fees based on a fixed number of AI interactions, avoiding surprise charges.

AgentKit offers the greatest control for developers looking to build a highly customized AI agent from scratch. It provides a comprehensive toolkit for coding complex logic and integrating various APIs, assuming you have the technical expertise.

Actions are the core capability that enables GPTs and agents to integrate with external systems via APIs. AgentKit allows developers to build custom integrations. For businesses needing seamless connections without coding, platforms like eesel AI offer one-click integrations with popular help desks.

GPTs lack reliability, testability, and version control for production. AgentKit is a generic toolkit requiring extensive development for business-specific features and relies heavily on the OpenAI ecosystem. Both often lack the specialized features and predictable pricing needed for robust business automation without significant custom work.

Share this post

Kenneth undefined

Article by

Kenneth Pangan

Writer and marketer for over ten years, Kenneth Pangan splits his time between history, politics, and art with plenty of interruptions from his dogs demanding attention.