5 best Reka AI alternatives for multimodal tasks in 2025

Reka AI has been getting a lot of attention for its powerful multimodal models that can process text, code, images, and even video. It’s seriously cool tech. But what happens when a powerful, raw AI model isn’t actually what your business needs? For most teams, it means signing up for a long, expensive, and complicated engineering project.

Trying to implement a raw AI model from scratch takes a ton of developer time, often comes with confusing pricing, and can take months before you see any real value. Let’s be honest, most teams aren’t looking for a science project; they need a tool that solves a real problem today.

In this guide, we’ll walk through the best Reka AI alternatives for 2025. We’ll touch on other foundational models for the developers who love building from the ground up, but we’ll also focus on ready-to-use platforms built for business teams, especially folks in customer support who just need something that works out of the box.

What is Reka AI?

Simply put, Reka AI is a company that builds big, powerful, multimodal large language models (LLMs). "Multimodal" just means their models (like Reka Core and Flash) can understand a mix of different data types all at once: text, images, video, and audio.

Reka’s main audience is developers and machine learning engineers who need a powerful AI "engine" to build their own custom apps. Think of it as a toolkit for creating things like advanced video analysis software or custom enterprise search systems. They give you the foundational tech, but your team is responsible for building the actual application, user interface, and all the integrations around it.

Why look for Reka AI alternatives?

Using a foundational model from a provider like Reka sounds amazing in theory, but it comes with a few real-world headaches that often get missed in the initial buzz.

• It’s complicated and takes forever to see results. This isn’t a plug-and-play tool. Implementing a raw model means you need a dedicated engineering team, a solid grasp of AI pipelines (like Retrieval-Augmented Generation, or RAG), and months of work just to get a basic version up and running. You’re literally building from scratch.

• It’s not built for specific business needs. Foundational models are generalists by design. They don’t come with built-in workflows for handling things like triaging support tickets, drafting agent replies in the right tone, or connecting to your helpdesk. You have to build all that logic yourself.

• The pricing is a mystery. Many model providers, Reka included, don’t list their prices online. You usually have to talk to a sales team just to get an estimate. On top of that, the total cost includes expensive GPU hosting, data processing, and ongoing engineering salaries, which can balloon quickly.

• Testing and deploying is risky. How do you even know if the AI you built is going to work correctly? You have to create your own complex testing systems. Rolling it out to live customers can be nerve-wracking without a safe way to simulate its performance and catch mistakes beforehand.

Our criteria for choosing the best Reka AI alternatives

With those challenges in mind, we put this list together based on what actually matters for day-to-day business use.

• Performance & capabilities: How smart is the model or platform, really? Can it handle different data types and reason through problems?

• Ease of use & time-to-value: Is it a raw model for developers, or is it a business tool you can set up in an afternoon without writing any code?

• Focus & use case: Is it a general-purpose model, or is it a specialized tool built to solve a specific problem, like automating customer service?

• Pricing transparency: Is the pricing clear and predictable? Or do you need to book a sales call and prepare for a complicated, usage-based bill?

• Integrations: How well does it play with the tools your team already uses every day?

Comparison of the top Reka AI alternatives for 2025

Tool	Best For	Pricing Model	Multimodal?	Key Feature
eesel AI	Customer support & IT teams	Transparent, tiered SaaS	Yes (text, images, files)	Go-live in minutes with no code
Cohere	Enterprises building custom AI apps	Usage-based (Contact Sales for Enterprise)	Yes (text, images, documents)	RAG & Tool Use capabilities
Anthropic (Claude)	High-quality text & code generation	Tiered SaaS & Usage-based API	Yes (text, images, documents)	Large context window & strong reasoning
Google Vertex AI	Teams invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem	Usage-based (complex)	Yes	Unified MLOps platform
Mistral AI	Open-source and on-premise deployments	Open source & paid API (usage-based)	Text-focused (some vision models)	Open-weight models

The 5 best Reka AI alternatives in 2025

1. eesel AI

While Reka gives you a powerful but generic AI engine, eesel AI is a platform built specifically to solve a huge business problem: customer and employee support. It connects directly to your existing helpdesk (like Zendesk or Freshdesk), pulls knowledge from places like Confluence and Google Docs, and links up with chat tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams to automate frontline support, help out agents, and triage tickets.

Why it’s a great alternative: eesel AI gives you the benefits of a multimodal AI without the headache. Instead of spending months building a custom solution, you can connect your tools and be up and running in minutes. It’s designed for support managers and operations leads, not just ML engineers. A really neat feature is its simulation mode, which lets you test the AI on thousands of your past tickets to see exactly how it will perform before it ever talks to a customer.

A screenshot of the eesel AI simulation mode, a great feature for those looking at Reka AI alternatives for business use.

Pros & Cons:

• Pros: Super simple to set up yourself, transparent pricing with no weird per-resolution fees, instantly unifies all your knowledge, lets you test risk-free with simulation, and you get full control over the AI workflows.

• Cons: It’s specialized for support and knowledge management. It’s not a general-purpose model for building any kind of app you can dream up.

Pricing:

eesel AI has clear, predictable pricing. All plans come with the whole product suite (AI Agent, Copilot, Triage, etc.).

The clear and predictable pricing plans for eesel AI, a top choice for Reka AI alternatives focused on business applications.

• Team Plan: $299/month ($239/month annually) for up to 1,000 AI interactions and 3 bots. Includes training on docs and websites, a copilot for your helpdesk, and Slack integration.

• Business Plan: $799/month ($639/month annually) for up to 3,000 AI interactions and unlimited bots. Adds training on past tickets, AI Actions for triage, bulk simulation, and MS Teams integration.

• Custom: If you need unlimited interactions or more advanced features, you can contact their sales team.

2. Cohere

Cohere offers a set of powerful LLMs, including Command R+, designed for enterprise use. Their platform is really good at Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and using other tools, which means their models are great at grounding answers in your company’s private data and interacting with external systems via APIs.

Why it’s a great alternative: If your company has the engineering firepower and wants to build a custom AI solution, Cohere is a strong competitor to Reka. It gives you more control over data privacy and deployment options (you can even run it on your own servers). People often say its models are less "chatty" and more to-the-point, which is a good fit for business apps.

Pros & Cons:

• Pros: Great for building custom RAG applications, has strong security features for enterprises, and the models are well-suited for professional communication.

• Cons: It’s still a foundational model that requires a lot of development work and technical know-how. The best enterprise features require a sales call, and the pricing can get complicated.

Pricing:

For Cohere’s main enterprise products, you have to ask for a custom quote. For developers using their API, it’s pay-as-you-go, but you have to hunt through their documentation for rates. For instance, their Command R+ model is $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens, which can be tough to estimate.

3. Anthropic (Claude)

Anthropic’s Claude models, especially the latest Claude 3.5 Sonnet, are consistently at the top of industry leaderboards. They’re famous for their huge context windows (up to 200,000 tokens, which is like feeding it a 500-page book), sharp reasoning skills, and a more natural, less robotic way of chatting.

Why it’s a great alternative: If what you really need is top-notch text and code generation for a custom app, Claude is an excellent pick. It’s great at summarizing long documents, creative writing, and tackling complex problems. It’s a direct competitor to models from OpenAI and Google and a solid alternative to Reka for tasks involving text and images.

Pros & Cons:

• Pros: Top-tier performance, amazing for creative and long-form text, and has strong safety features baked in.

• Cons: Like Reka, it’s a general tool you have to build on top of. API costs can add up if you’re using it a lot.

Pricing:

Anthropic offers both a web chat tool and a developer API.

• Free Plan: Lets you try Claude with daily limits.

• Pro Plan: $20/month ($17/month annually) for more usage and access to more models.

• Max Plan: Starts at $100/month for way more usage than Pro and early access to new stuff.

• API Pricing: Depends on the model. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens.

4. Google Vertex AI

Vertex AI isn’t just one model; it’s Google’s entire platform for building, deploying, and managing machine learning models. It gives you access to Google’s own models (like Gemini) plus a bunch of others, all in one place.

Why it’s a great alternative: For companies already deep in the Google Cloud ecosystem, Vertex AI is the natural choice. It integrates tightly with other Google services, providing a super powerful and scalable foundation for very complex AI projects.

Pros & Cons:

• Pros: A complete ecosystem for machine learning operations (MLOps), access to a ton of different models, and it’s incredibly powerful.

• Cons: It can be overwhelming for teams without dedicated ML experts. The pricing is famously complicated and hard to predict. It’s the definition of a "build" platform, not a "buy" solution.

Pricing:

Vertex AI’s pricing is extremely complex. It’s usage-based across dozens of different services. For example, text generation with one of the Gemini models starts at $0.0001 per 1,000 characters, but you also pay separately for training, deployment, storage, and a bunch of other things. Figuring out your monthly bill is a real challenge.

5. Mistral AI

Mistral AI, a European company, has become super popular by releasing powerful open-source models that can go toe-to-toe with the big closed-source players. They’re a great choice for companies that care about controlling their own data and want the flexibility to host models on their own infrastructure.

Why it’s a great alternative: If you need to run an LLM on your own servers for security or compliance reasons, Mistral is one of the best out there. Their open models give you total control. And if you don’t want to manage your own servers, their paid API is often cheaper than the bigger competitors.

Pros & Cons:

• Pros: High-quality open-source models, flexible enough for on-premise deployment, and a strong European presence for data residency.

• Cons: Mostly focused on text, so it’s less suited for true multimodal tasks compared to Reka. Managing an open-source deployment takes a lot of technical skill.

Pricing:

Mistral’s open-weight models are free to download and use on your own hardware. They also have a pay-as-you-go API with competitive rates that change depending on the model you use.

This guide from the video provides a great overview of the Reka AI multimodal model, giving context to the alternatives discussed.

How to choose the right Reka AI alternatives for you

The decision really boils down to the classic "build vs. buy" question.

You should probably "build" with a foundational model (like Cohere, Anthropic, or Mistral) if:

• You have AI/ML engineers on your team and a budget for a project that will take several months.

• Your use case is so unique that no off-the-shelf platform can solve it.

• You need total control over the AI’s code and where it’s hosted.

You should probably "buy" an applied AI platform (like eesel AI) if:

• You need to solve a specific business problem now, like automating customer support.

• You want a solution that works with your existing tools without a massive migration project.

• You’re a business leader, like a Head of Support, who needs to show results quickly without hiring a new team of developers.

• You prefer clear pricing and want to get started on your own in minutes, not months.

Reka AI alternatives: From raw power to real results

Reka AI and its direct competitors offer incredible, raw AI power. They’re the engines. But an engine by itself doesn’t get you anywhere, you need a car.

For most businesses, especially when it comes to customer support, an applied platform is the "car." It takes all that advanced AI power and packages it into a solution that solves real problems from day one, without forcing you to become an expert mechanic. If you want to transform your customer support with AI, don’t just look for a better engine. Find a tool that’s already built for the job.

Ready to see how an applied AI platform can change your support workflows? Try eesel AI for free and see for yourself in under 5 minutes.