AgentKit vs GPTs: A practical guide for businesses

Stevia Putri
Written by

Stevia Putri

Reviewed by

Katelin Teen

Last edited November 14, 2025

Expert Verified

AgentKit vs GPTs: A practical guide for businesses

It feels like the world of AI is moving a million miles an hour. You finally get your head around one tool, and suddenly, something new and way more powerful pops up. We’ve all watched AI go from simple chatbots to these complex, autonomous agents in what feels like a heartbeat. The latest chapter in this story is OpenAI’s shift from easy-to-make custom GPTs to the much heavier, developer-focused AgentKit.

So, why should you care? If you run a business or manage a support team, this change is a pretty big deal. It’s a signal that AI is moving beyond simple tricks and into tools that can do real, heavy lifting inside your company. This guide is here to cut through the noise. We'll walk through the actual differences between GPTs and AgentKit, see what’s new, and help you figure out what makes the most sense for your team (or if there’s a better option altogether).

What are OpenAI's GPTs?

Alright, let's start with the basics. GPTs are basically custom-tailored versions of ChatGPT. You can build one by giving it specific instructions, some background knowledge, and a list of things it can do. Think of it like hiring an assistant and giving them a job description and a training manual.

The best thing about them is how simple they are. You don't need to know any code. You literally just chat with an interface, tell it what you want it to do, and upload a few files for it to learn from. This makes them great for personal projects, messing around with ideas, or building a simple helper for an internal task, like a GPT that knows your brand style guide and helps you draft social media posts.

But that simplicity comes with some major drawbacks for any real business use. GPTs rely on the static files you upload for their knowledge, which means they can’t access live information. The moment you create them, they're already on their way to being out of date. Their ability to connect with other apps is pretty limited, and they just weren’t built for the kind of complex, multi-step jobs that businesses need to get done. They’re a fun starting point, but they’re not ready for primetime.

What is OpenAI's AgentKit?

AgentKit is OpenAI’s response to the limitations of GPTs. This isn't a single product you can just log into. It's a full-blown toolkit for developers to build, test, and launch production-ready AI agents. It’s a serious step up in both power and complexity.

The kit is made up of a few main parts:

  • Agent Builder: A visual canvas where developers use drag-and-drop nodes to map out complicated workflows for one or more agents.

  • Connector Registry: A central hub for managing connections to live data sources, like Google Drive, and other third-party tools.

  • ChatKit: A set of tools that lets developers embed the AI agent’s chat interface directly into their own websites and apps.

  • Evals & Guardrails: Features for testing how well an agent is doing, measuring its accuracy, and putting safety checks in place to make sure it doesn't go off the rails.

A diagram illustrating the interconnected components of OpenAI
A diagram illustrating the interconnected components of OpenAI

AgentKit is a huge leap toward AI that can handle actual business processes, like managing customer support tickets from start to finish or doing in-depth research by connecting directly to your company’s systems. But, and this is a big but, you have to be clear about who it’s for. AgentKit is powerful, but it’s built exclusively for developers. It takes a lot of technical skill, time, and money to get it up and running properly.

AgentKit vs GPTs: Key differences from simple bots to business-ready agents

The jump from GPTs to AgentKit is less of a step and more of a canyon. They’re completely different tools made for different people with different goals. Let's get into the main distinctions.

Customization and control: Text prompts vs visual workflows

Making a GPT is all about writing. You type out instructions in plain English, telling the AI how you want it to act. AgentKit throws that out the window in favor of a visual, node-based Agent Builder. Developers can drag and connect different components to create complex logic, basically drawing a flowchart of what the agent should do at every turn.

graph TD subgraph GPTs Workflow A[Start: User writes text prompt] --> B{GPT processes instructions}; B --> C[Executes simple, pre-defined actions]; C --> D[End: Delivers output]; end

subgraph AgentKit Workflow E[Start: Developer designs visual workflow] --> F{Agent Builder with multiple nodes}; F --> G[Node 1: Connect to API]; F --> H[Node 2: Access live data]; F --> I[Node 3: Apply custom logic]; G & H & I --> J{Agent executes complex, multi-step task}; J --> K[End: Delivers dynamic output]; end

style GPTs Workflow fill:#f9f9f9,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style AgentKit Workflow fill:#f0f8ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

While the visual builder is definitely more powerful for designing these workflows, it still requires a developer's brain. You’re thinking about version control, API keys, and how all the different nodes are going to talk to each other. It’s a technical process, through and through.

This leaves a huge gap for most business teams. You need the power, but you don't have a dev team on speed dial. This is the problem tools like eesel AI were built to solve. It gives you a fully customizable workflow engine that’s made for business users, not programmers. You can define your AI’s personality, set up rules for when to escalate to a human, and tell it exactly what knowledge to use, all from a straightforward dashboard. You get the power of a custom agent without needing to wait months for development. You can be up and running in minutes.

Data and integrations: Static files vs live systems

Like we said, a GPT’s knowledge is frozen in time, based only on the files you gave it when you set it up. For any real business application, that’s a dealbreaker. Your company’s information changes every single day, and your AI needs to be able to keep up.

AgentKit’s Connector Registry is meant to fix this by letting agents plug into live data sources and APIs like Google Drive or SharePoint. This allows the agent to pull in up-to-the-minute information to do its job.

The catch? Setting up and looking after these connections is, you guessed it, a technical job for a developer. It’s not a simple plug-and-play setup for connecting to the tools your business actually runs on, like your help desk or internal wiki. You can’t just click a button and have it start learning from your company’s brain.

This is another spot where a purpose-built platform just makes more sense. eesel AI is designed to connect to all your knowledge sources instantly, with no developer help needed. It has one-click integrations with the tools you already use, including help desks like Zendesk and Intercom, and knowledge bases like Confluence and Notion. Even better, eesel AI can automatically train itself on your team's past support conversations, so it learns your specific brand voice and common customer solutions from day one.

Deployment and reliability: Personal helpers vs production agents

How you actually use these tools couldn’t be more different. You share a GPT with a simple link, and it lives only inside the ChatGPT website. AgentKit, on the other hand, is designed for embedding agents directly into your own products and websites using its ChatKit feature.

This brings us to the really important topic of trust. You can't put an AI in front of your customers if you’re not 100% sure it will perform correctly and safely. GPTs have no real testing framework, which makes them way too risky for any serious, customer-facing role.

AgentKit tries to solve this with its "Evals" and "Guardrails," which help developers measure performance and add safety rules. This is a must-have for any real system, but it’s a manual, complicated process that needs constant attention from an engineering team.

Here, eesel AI's built-in simulation mode offers a much more practical approach. Instead of a complex, developer-led testing process, eesel AI lets you test your agent on thousands of your own past support tickets in a totally risk-free sandbox. This gives you a real, data-backed prediction of its resolution rate and how much money it could save you before it ever speaks to a single customer. You can then roll out automation slowly, starting with certain types of tickets, and expand its duties as you get more comfortable. It’s the most sensible and business-friendly way to bring AI into a support team.

The business user's dilemma: Is AgentKit right for you?

Let's boil it down. GPTs are too basic for real business needs, and AgentKit is a powerful but highly complex toolkit that requires a well-staffed engineering team.

This puts most businesses in a tough spot. What if you're a support manager or an operations lead who needs a reliable AI agent but doesn't have a team of AI engineers just sitting around?

This is exactly the problem eesel AI was created to solve. It gives you the power of an advanced AI agent framework but with the simplicity of a no-code, self-serve platform. It’s built for the business user who needs to get things done now, not next quarter.

Here’s a quick table to make the differences crystal clear:

FeatureOpenAI AgentKiteesel AI
Who it's forDevelopers, AI EngineersBusiness Teams (Support, IT, Ops)
Setup TimeWeeks to monthsMinutes to hours
OnboardingNeeds technical know-how, codingSuper self-serve, no sales call required
IntegrationsDeveloper-configured via Connector Registry100+ one-click integrations (Zendesk, Slack, etc.)
Knowledge SourcesFiles, APIs, databasesPast tickets, help centers, Confluence, Google Docs
TestingManual setup with Evals frameworkPowerful, one-click simulation on your past tickets
Pricing ModelBased on API usage (unpredictable)Transparent, predictable plans (no per-resolution fees)
This video provides an excellent hands-on test of OpenAI's Agent Builder, exploring how its advanced workflow capabilities compare to other automation tools.

Choosing the right tool for your AI agent

The evolution from GPTs to AgentKit points to a clear trend: AI agents are getting smarter, more connected, and more independent. This is an exciting change that will open up a ton of ways for businesses to automate work and run more efficiently.

But it’s really important to pick the right tool for the job. GPTs are great for personal experiments and simple little tasks. AgentKit is a beast of a toolkit for developer teams that need to build completely custom AI solutions from scratch.

For most businesses, though, especially in customer service and internal support, the best solution isn't just about raw technical power. It’s about speed, simplicity, and being able to trust the tool. You need something that connects to your existing systems, learns from your company's unique knowledge, and gives you the confidence to put it in front of your customers.

For teams that need to launch a powerful, fully integrated AI support agent without the developer overhead, eesel AI offers the fastest and most direct path to getting real results.

Frequently asked questions

GPTs are designed for anyone to create simple, custom chatbots without code. AgentKit, conversely, is a professional toolkit built exclusively for developers and AI engineers to create complex, production-grade AI agents.

GPTs are configured through conversational prompts and file uploads, making them easy to set up for basic tasks. AgentKit utilizes a visual, node-based "Agent Builder" for intricate workflow design, requiring significant technical expertise.

GPTs are limited to static information provided during their creation. AgentKit can connect to live data sources and third-party tools via its "Connector Registry," but this integration demands technical setup and maintenance.

GPTs have very limited capabilities for integrating with other business applications. AgentKit offers more extensive integration potential through its API connections, but establishing and managing these requires developer resources and expertise.

GPTs lack built-in testing frameworks, making them risky for customer-facing use. AgentKit includes "Evals & Guardrails" to help developers measure performance and implement safety checks, but this is a manual and continuous engineering task.

GPTs are suitable for personal experiments or very simple internal helpers. AgentKit is appropriate for large enterprises with dedicated AI engineering teams who need to build highly customized, deeply integrated solutions from the ground up.

The primary barrier is technical complexity and resource allocation. While GPTs are too simple, AgentKit requires significant developer time, expertise, and ongoing investment, which most businesses lack for immediate deployment.

Share this post

Stevia undefined

Article by

Stevia Putri

Stevia Putri is a marketing generalist at eesel AI, where she helps turn powerful AI tools into stories that resonate. She’s driven by curiosity, clarity, and the human side of technology.