If you’ve been searching for a "Lambda review," you've probably noticed things can get a little confusing. The search results might be talking about AWS Lambda for serverless code, a sci-fi book, or the company we’re actually interested in: Lambda Labs, a provider of the heavy-duty GPU cloud infrastructure needed to build AI.
While they’re all interesting, you’re likely here to answer a much simpler question: what tools will actually help my business use AI to solve real problems, like making customer support better or speeding up internal tasks?
This guide is for you. We’ll use a review of Lambda Labs as a real-world example to explore the challenges of building an AI solution from the ground up. More importantly, we'll talk about when it makes more sense to pick a ready-to-use AI application that gets you results much, much faster.
What is Lambda Labs?
So, what does Lambda Labs actually do? In short, they provide the hardware and cloud infrastructure specifically built for machine learning. Think of them as the people supplying the super-powered computers and raw materials for the AI gold rush.
They’re known for building high-performance workstations and servers packed with powerful NVIDIA GPUs. Their cloud service, Lambda GPU Cloud, is their attempt to make all that power available on demand, going up against giants like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
The big draw for many, as you’ll see in user forums, is the promise of cheaper, no-frills access to top-tier GPUs. For a team of data scientists building a custom AI model from scratch, this kind of raw computing power is absolutely necessary. They provide the foundational "picks and shovels" for developers to build with.
The user experience on the Lambda Labs cloud
The idea of affordable, powerful GPU instances is definitely appealing, but what's it really like to use the service? Reviews from developers and engineers who've been in the trenches tell a more complicated story. Their experiences highlight a common disconnect between having access to powerful tools and actually using them to deliver business value without pulling your hair out.
Let’s break down what people are saying.
The promise: Accessible GPU power for AI
On paper, the offer looks fantastic. One reviewer pointed out that the pricing for a 4-GPU instance at $1.50/hr is "insanely low," and their 8-GPU V100 instance was a much better deal than Amazon's. For startups or research projects where every dollar counts, that’s a huge plus. The user interface is often described as "straightforward and clean," which is meant to make it simple to get a powerful machine up and running.
The reality: Common challenges and limitations
Unfortunately, hands-on reviews show that a few practical hurdles can turn that great deal into a time-consuming headache.
-
Instance and configuration issues: A detailed review from Drakeor.com documented a developer’s struggle just to get a modern instance launched. It repeatedly failed, forcing them to use an older "legacy" node that couldn't run their models. They also found the node tricky to configure, admitting they "bricked" it several times and had to start from scratch. This gets to the heart of the problem with infrastructure-level tools: the user is on the hook for all the setup, compatibility checks, and maintenance.
-
Inconsistent performance and support: The same reviewer mentioned that the machine’s performance "varied wildly," sometimes becoming "agonizingly slow" for no clear reason. When you’re paying by the hour, that kind of unreliability is a project-killer. To make matters worse, when they tried to get help, the support widget itself was broken.
-
Management and strategy concerns: This isn't just an external issue. Employee reviews on sites like Glassdoor and Teamblind suggest some of these operational bumps might start from the inside. While many employees love the smart engineering team, there are recurring comments about "indecisive" management and a lack of clear strategy. As one former employee put it, "The success so far is admirable but their lack of humility and inability to communicate and plan effectively is a huge liability."
This doesn’t mean infrastructure like Lambda Labs is useless. It’s essential for teams doing deep AI research. But for most companies, these reviews shine a light on the hidden costs of building from scratch. Every hour your team spends troubleshooting infrastructure is an hour they aren't spending on solving the business problem you hired them for.
Beyond infrastructure: The case for an application layer
The struggles that users face with raw infrastructure like Lambda Labs bring up a big question for any company adopting AI: do you want to be in the business of building and maintaining AI systems, or the business of using them?
For 99% of companies, the answer is the latter. Your support team doesn't need a cluster of GPUs; they need an AI that can resolve customer tickets right away. Your sales team doesn't need to configure a server; they need a chatbot that can answer product questions around the clock.
This is the key difference between infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) and software-as-a-service (SaaS). IaaS gives you the raw building blocks, but SaaS delivers a finished tool that solves a specific problem. When you rely only on infrastructure, your team is forced to become part-time server managers and software compatibility experts, pulling them away from their actual jobs.
This workflow shows the process of choosing the right AI tool, which is simpler with an application-first approach as this Lambda review explains.A true application platform handles all that messy background work for you. It should plug into the tools you already use and be simple enough for the teams who actually use it, not just your engineers.
A better approach: eesel AI for business teams
Instead of wrestling with low-level infrastructure, an application-first platform like eesel AI lets you put powerful, custom AI agents to work right inside your existing setup. It’s designed for business users, not just developers, to manage, so you get all the benefits of AI without the technical overhead.
Here’s how this approach directly solves the frustrations we saw in our Lambda review.
Go from setup struggles to go-live in minutes
Remember those stories of spending days just trying to get a working machine online? With eesel AI, you can skip all that. It’s completely self-serve. You can connect your help desk, whether it’s Zendesk, Freshdesk, or Intercom, with a single click. In minutes, you can have a working AI Copilot drafting replies for your team. No servers to manage, no dependencies to install. It just works.
Swap technical headaches for total workflow control
The frustration of "bricking" a machine or fighting with outdated software just disappears with a managed platform. With eesel AI, you get a simple but powerful visual workflow engine that anyone on your team can understand.
This Lambda review highlights how a visual workflow engine, like the one shown here for a Zendesk AI agent, gives teams control without technical headaches.-
Customizable AI Persona: You can use a simple prompt editor to tell your AI exactly how to talk, what tone to use, and when to pass a conversation to a human.
-
Selective Automation: You're in complete control. You decide which kinds of tickets the AI should handle. You can start small with common questions and let it take on more as your team gets comfortable.
-
Connect All Your Knowledge: eesel AI doesn't just live in your help desk. It can instantly pull knowledge from all your company's resources, like Confluence, Google Docs, Notion, and even past tickets, to give customers the most accurate and complete answers.
Test with confidence before you deploy
One of the biggest risks of a DIY approach is flying blind. You can spend weeks building something only to find out it doesn't work as expected. eesel AI’s simulation mode takes that risk off the table. You can test your AI agent on thousands of your past tickets to see exactly how it would have performed. This gives you a clear forecast of your automation rate and helps you spot gaps in your knowledge base before it ever talks to a real customer.
| Feature | Infrastructure (e.g., Lambda Labs) | Application Platform (eesel AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | Days to weeks; requires technical expertise. | Minutes; self-serve and no-code. |
| Maintenance | User is responsible for all configuration, updates, and troubleshooting. | Fully managed by eesel AI. |
| Control | Granular control over hardware, but complex to manage. | Granular control over AI behavior and workflows via a simple UI. |
| Testing | Manual testing and custom scripts required. | Built-in simulation mode to test on historical data instantly. |
| Focus | Managing servers and compute resources. | Solving business problems (e.g., ticket deflection, agent assist). |
Choosing the right layer of the AI stack
So, what’s the main takeaway from this Lambda review? While infrastructure providers like Lambda Labs offer powerful and affordable building blocks for AI, they’re just one piece of the puzzle. The day-to-day reality of using these tools involves a lot of technical know-how and frustrating dead-ends that can slow you down and burn through your budget.
For most business leaders, the goal isn't to become an infrastructure guru. It's to use AI to get real results, faster support, more efficient teams, and happier customers.
This video offers a brief introduction to AWS Lambda, a serverless compute service that highlights the infrastructure layer discussed in our Lambda review.
An application-first platform like eesel AI hides all the technical complexity, giving you a direct path to the solution. By focusing on ease of use, smooth integrations, and a confident rollout, it offers a much faster and more reliable way to reach your business goals with AI. Instead of building from the ground up, you can start seeing a return from day one.
Frequently asked questions
This Lambda review focuses on Lambda Labs as a provider of high-performance GPU cloud infrastructure and workstations, specifically designed for machine learning and AI development. They offer the raw computing power for teams building custom AI models from the ground up.
The infrastructure detailed in this Lambda review is best suited for teams of data scientists or researchers undertaking deep AI research and custom model development. These teams require granular control over hardware and are prepared for the extensive setup and maintenance involved.
This Lambda review points out issues like difficulties in launching and configuring modern instances, inconsistent machine performance, and problems with customer support. These challenges highlight the significant time and expertise required to manage low-level infrastructure.
No, this Lambda review suggests that while Lambda Labs offers competitively priced GPU instances, the hidden costs of extensive setup, troubleshooting, and maintenance can outweigh these savings. It emphasizes that time spent on infrastructure management detracts from solving core business problems.
This Lambda review explains that application-first platforms like eesel AI handle all the technical overhead, allowing business users to deploy AI agents directly into existing workflows without managing servers or dependencies. It focuses on delivering immediate business value rather than infrastructure building.
The key benefit, as highlighted in this Lambda review, is a dramatically faster path to achieving business results. Application platforms enable quick setup, simplified management, and reliable deployment, allowing teams to focus on using AI to solve problems rather than building the underlying systems.
