EU AI Act Codes of Practice: A Simple guide for support teams

Let's be real, hearing "EU AI Act" probably makes your eyes glaze over. It sounds complicated, heavy, and like one more piece of red tape to deal with. But if you peel back the layers of legal speak, it’s actually about something every support team cares about: building trust in the AI tools we’re all starting to use.

And yeah, while the big headlines are all about the tech giants, these rules have a very real impact on any business using AI for customer support. The good news? You don't need a law degree to figure this out.

We're going to break down the official Codes of Practice into plain English. We’ll focus on the three things that actually matter for your day-to-day work: transparency, copyright, and security. You'll walk away knowing what this all means for your team and how to pick an AI tool that won't land you in hot water.

What are the EU AI Act's Codes of Practice?

Think of the EU AI Act as the world’s first major rulebook for artificial intelligence. The "Codes of Practice" are a specific chapter in that book, basically an instruction manual for the big, powerful AI models (known as General-Purpose AI, or GPAI) that power most modern support tools.

Why does this matter to you? While it's technically voluntary for AI companies to sign up for the Code, doing so gives them a "presumption of conformity." In normal language, that means regulators will assume you're following the rules if your AI provider has adopted the Code. This saves you a ton of legal headaches and paperwork. Providers who decide to go their own way will likely get a lot more side-eye from the EU’s new AI Office.

The Code is built on three pillars that are super relevant if you use AI to talk to customers:

1. Transparency: Knowing what your AI was trained on and how it gets its answers.

2. Copyright: Making sure the AI respects intellectual property and isn't using stolen data.

3. Safety and Security: Ensuring your AI is reliable, secure, and doesn't go off the rails.

Let's dig into what each of these really means for your support team.

The transparency chapter

It’s one thing for an AI to spit out an answer. It’s another thing entirely to know how it got there. For support teams, this isn't just a nerdy detail, it’s the bedrock of trust. If you can’t trace an AI's logic, you can’t be sure it's giving your customers information that’s accurate, current, or even remotely on-brand.

What this means for transparency

The main point of the transparency chapter is that AI providers must document how their models work, what they were built for, and (this is the big one) a summary of the data they were trained on.

This is a direct shot at the "black box" problem with a lot of generic AI tools. When an AI is trained on the entire, messy, unfiltered internet, you have zero visibility into where its knowledge comes from. For a support team, this is a huge gamble. The AI could easily pull an outdated solution from a five-year-old forum post, "hallucinate" a policy that sounds official but is completely wrong, or pick up weird biases from its training data. When that happens, it's your team, not the AI company, that has to clean up the mess with a confused or angry customer.

Building trust with transparent AI

This is where the type of AI platform you choose really matters. Instead of using a generic model with a mysterious past, a transparent AI learns from your own controlled sources.

This is exactly how we built eesel AI. Our platform doesn’t just guess; it connects directly to your company’s trusted information to learn from what you already know. That means it learns from past tickets in help desks like Zendesk and Intercom, your official knowledge base articles, and your internal docs in places like Confluence or Google Docs.

The result? An AI that works from a knowledge base you actually own and manage. You always know why it gives an answer, because the source is your own information. This approach gives you better, more accurate answers and lines up perfectly with the EU’s transparency rules by making the AI’s reasoning totally clear.

eesel AI connects to your company's trusted information sources, ensuring transparency and compliance with the EU AI Act Codes of Practice and compliance guidance for support AI.

The copyright chapter

Generative AI blew up, and a bunch of lawsuits followed. At the heart of it all is one big question: what data was this AI trained on, and did they have the right to use it? For any business, using a support tool built on a shaky legal foundation is a risk you just can't afford.

What the code says on copyright

The Code of Practice tells AI providers they need to have a policy for complying with EU copyright law. They have to respect "opt-out" requests from websites (like a "robots.txt" file that tells web crawlers to keep out) and stop scraping data from sites known for piracy.

This is a direct response to the common practice of training huge models by hoovering up the internet, often without asking permission. If your support AI gives a customer a response that’s based on copyrighted material it scraped illegally, your company could be on the hook. It's a hidden risk built into many generic AI tools.

Choosing a compliant AI

The easiest way to sidestep these legal issues is to use an AI that isn’t built on a mountain of questionable data to begin with.

Because eesel AI learns from your company's own information, your support history, internal guides, and official docs, it avoids the copyright mess plaguing models trained on the open web. The knowledge belongs to you, plain and simple.

We take this a step further by making sure your data is never used to train our general models or for any other company. It is walled off and used only to power your AI agents. This commitment to data privacy is fundamental to how our platform works.

The safety and security chapter

The final piece of the puzzle is all about trust and predictability. The EU AI Act talks about "systemic risks," which sounds very academic, but for a support team, these risks are concrete and can pop up any day. Can you trust your AI to handle tasks correctly without someone constantly looking over its shoulder?

What the safety and security guidance means

The Code of Practice pushes AI providers to evaluate their models, figure out potential risks, track when things go wrong, and have strong cybersecurity. While the strictest rules are for the mega-models, the core ideas apply to any AI you put in front of a customer.

Think about the real-world risks in your support queue. What happens if your AI promises a customer a refund amount that’s double your policy? What if it confidently walks someone through troubleshooting steps for a product you stopped selling last year? An untested AI isn't a helper; it's a liability. Unfortunately, a lot of AI tools out there give you little more than an on/off switch, with no way to see how it will perform before it's live.

How to confidently roll out AI

This is why features like simulation and a gradual rollout aren't just fancy extras. They're essential for using AI responsibly and meeting the spirit of the Code's rules on evaluation and risk management.

With a feature like eesel AI's powerful simulation mode, you can safely test your AI agent on thousands of your own past tickets in a practice environment. You get to see exactly how it would have replied to real customer questions, check its accuracy, and get solid forecasts on resolution rates, all before a single customer ever sees it. This lets you spot weaknesses, fill in knowledge gaps, and tweak its behavior without any risk.

eesel AI's simulation mode allows teams to test performance and manage risks, aligning with the safety and security chapter of the EU AI Act Codes of Practice and compliance guidance for support AI.

Plus, you don’t have to go all-in on automation at once. eesel AI gives you fine-grained control, so you can start by letting the AI handle just specific, low-risk tickets (like "where's my order?") while sending everything else to your human team. As you get more comfortable with its performance, you can slowly give it more responsibility. This safety-first approach is exactly what these new regulations are meant to encourage.

Trust and compliance: The takeaway

The EU AI Act and its Codes of Practice are setting a new standard for AI around the world. But at the end of the day, this isn't just about ticking legal boxes. It's a chance to build real, lasting trust with your customers by showing them you're committed to using technology in a responsible way.

The principles are straightforward: be open about how your AI works, respect data and copyright, and make sure your tools are safe and predictable. The biggest decision you'll make is choosing an AI partner that already has these ideas baked into its very design.

Get compliance-ready AI

Instead of trying to force a generic AI tool to be compliant, you can start with a platform that was built from the ground up for transparency, data control, and predictable results. eesel AI is the smart, safe choice for support teams getting ready for this new regulatory landscape.

See for yourself how an AI trained on your own knowledge works. You can set up your first AI agent and run a risk-free simulation on your past tickets in just a few minutes.

Start Your Free Trial with eesel AI