A deep dive into Fin Conversation Analytics and its alternatives (2025)

Stevia Putri
Written by

Stevia Putri

Katelin Teen
Reviewed by

Katelin Teen

Last edited October 14, 2025

Expert Verified

If you’re on a support team, you’re probably swimming in data but still thirsty for actual insights. You’re not just trying to close tickets; you’re trying to figure out the why behind every customer chat. What questions keep popping up? Where are the holes in our help docs? Nailing these answers is how you shift from constantly putting out fires to preventing them in the first place. That’s what conversation analytics is all about.

This guide is a straight-up look at Intercom’s Fin Conversation Analytics. We’ll get into its main features, how it works, what it costs, and where it falls short. By the end, you’ll have a much clearer idea of whether it’s the right tool to help you find the stories hidden in your support chats.

What is Fin Conversation Analytics?

First off, Fin Conversation Analytics isn’t a separate product you can buy off the shelf. It’s a set of features woven into Intercom's bigger AI platform, which includes the Fin AI Agent and Fin Insights. The whole point is to dig into customer conversations to help both your AI bot and your human agents get better at their jobs.

According to Intercom, Fin can:

  • Automatically find and group conversation topics that didn't get resolved.

  • Spot gaps in your help content and even suggest new articles to write.

  • Measure customer experience with its new CX Score, which is meant to be more insightful than old-school CSAT surveys.

  • Create a "flywheel" where the AI learns from how your team solves problems, so it gets smarter over time.

It’s really built for teams who are already committed to the Intercom ecosystem and want to get the most out of their Fin AI agent.

How Fin Conversation Analytics works

Fin's analytics works in a cycle: analyze, optimize, and learn. The goal isn’t just to show you what’s broken but to help the system gradually fix itself. Let’s look at the key parts.

Finding insights with the Optimize tab and CX Score

The first step is figuring out where the problems are. Fin’s “Optimize” tab is your main dashboard for this. It groups unanswered questions by topic, so you can see at a glance what’s tripping up your customers the most. You might see a big cluster of chats about your "refund policy" or "login issues." This is your starting point.

To give you another layer of data, Intercom rolled out its AI-driven CX Score. Instead of just relying on the few customers who actually fill out CSAT surveys, the CX Score scans 100% of conversations. It looks for clues like customer sentiment, how much effort they had to put in, and whether their problem was actually solved. This gives you a broader, and arguably more accurate, picture of how customers are feeling.

A screenshot of Intercom's reporting dashboard, which provides insights for Fin Conversation Analytics.
A screenshot of Intercom's reporting dashboard, which provides insights for Fin Conversation Analytics.

But here’s the catch. While these tools are good at telling you what the problems are, fixing them is often still on you. As users on Intercom’s own community forums have mentioned, sifting through thousands of unresolved conversations to find the root cause is still "quite a manual process." The platform gives you a nudge in the right direction, but you’re the one who has to do the legwork of reading through transcripts and updating help articles.

The continuous improvement flywheel

This is where Fin tries to connect the dots. The "flywheel" is a fancy term for a loop where the AI learns from your team. When a question is too tricky for Fin, it gets passed to a human agent. The AI then watches how the agent handles it successfully.

If it sees the same problem and solution happen a few times, it can automatically draft a new knowledge base article based on that successful human chat. A manager just has to review and approve the draft, and boom, it’s added to the knowledge base for Fin to use next time. In theory, your agents should only have to solve a new, tough problem once. It seems to work, too. One report mentioned that this process helped the AI company Anthropic boost its resolution rate by 5%.


graph TD  

    A[Customer asks tough question] --> B{Fin AI cannot resolve};  

    B --> C[Ticket escalated to Human Agent];  

    C --> D[Agent successfully solves issue];  

    D --> E{AI observes solution};  

    E --> F[AI drafts new knowledge base article];  

    F --> G[Manager reviews and approves];  

    G --> H[Article published to knowledge base];  

    H --> I[Fin AI uses new article for future questions];  

It’s a great idea, but it’s not completely hands-off. The loop still depends on your human agents to crack the tough cases and on managers to approve the new content. It’s a step toward a self-improving system, but it isn’t fully autonomous.

The real cost of Fin Conversation Analytics: Pricing and limitations

Before you go all-in on the Intercom ecosystem, it’s a good idea to look at the whole picture. The features are slick, but the pricing and practical limits can really affect your budget and workflow.

The per-resolution pricing model

Fin’s pricing is based on usage, which can be both a blessing and a curse. Here’s how it breaks down:

  • Fin with your current helpdesk: $0.99 per resolution, with a 50 resolutions per month minimum.

  • Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk: Starts at $39 per seat, per month, plus $0.99 for every resolution.

The biggest issue here is the lack of predictability. If your support volume shoots up during a product launch or a holiday rush, your bill will shoot up right along with it. This model can make budgeting a headache and, funnily enough, might make you hesitant to automate too much. You get rewarded for solving more customer issues with a bigger invoice.

This is a big difference from platforms that offer simple, subscription-based plans. For example, eesel AI has plans with a generous number of AI interactions for a flat monthly fee. Your costs are always predictable, so you can scale up your automation without sweating over a surprise bill.

A screenshot of eesel AI's pricing page, showing a predictable alternative to Fin Conversation Analytics pricing.
A screenshot of eesel AI's pricing page, showing a predictable alternative to Fin Conversation Analytics pricing.

Common limitations and user challenges

Beyond the price tag, teams often hit a few snags with Fin.

  • Tough to customize: As some users have pointed out, tweaking Fin’s behavior isn't always straightforward. It can be hard to fine-tune when a conversation gets escalated or to stop the AI from handing off certain chats you’d rather it handled itself.

  • Rigid workflows: Fin is at its best when all of your knowledge and processes are inside Intercom. If your documentation lives in different places like Confluence or Google Docs, getting Fin to use that info can be a pain without migrating everything over. You’re pretty much locked into their way of doing things.

  • The manual analysis problem: Like we touched on earlier, the platform doesn’t yet have great tools for optimizing at scale. The "Optimize" tab shows you the problem spots, but it doesn't give you an easy way to analyze thousands of transcripts to find the root cause and fix it efficiently.

This table sums up the key differences between Fin's all-in-one approach and a more flexible, overlay-style tool.

FeatureFin Conversation AnalyticsA Flexible Alternative (like eesel AI)
Pricing Model$0.99 per resolution (unpredictable)Fixed monthly fee (predictable costs)
SetupDeeply integrated into IntercomSelf-serve, go live in minutes
Helpdesk IntegrationPrimarily for Intercom; some other helpdesksWorks on top of your existing helpdesk (Zendesk, Freshdesk, etc.)
CustomizationLimited control over escalation rulesGranular control via a customizable workflow engine
TestingLimited previewPowerful simulation on thousands of past tickets
Knowledge SourcesBest with Intercom-native sourcesConnects instantly to Confluence, Google Docs, past tickets, etc.

A more flexible approach to conversation analytics

For teams who care about control, flexibility, and predictable costs, a modern alternative like eesel AI offers a different way forward. Instead of making you move into a whole new ecosystem, it works like a smart layer on top of the tools you already know and use.

With eesel AI, you can be up and running in minutes, not months. The platform is completely self-serve, letting you connect your helpdesk (whether it's Zendesk, Freshdesk, or even Intercom), link up your knowledge sources, and launch your AI agent without a single sales call or mandatory demo.

One of the biggest pluses is being able to test with confidence. eesel AI’s simulation mode runs your AI setup against thousands of your past tickets before it ever talks to a real customer. This gives you a solid forecast of its resolution rate, shows you exactly where your knowledge gaps are, and helps you build a real business case for automation. It tackles that "manual analysis" headache by helping you optimize right from the start.

eesel AI's simulation mode offers a powerful alternative for testing your setup, a key differentiator in Fin Conversation Analytics comparisons.
eesel AI's simulation mode offers a powerful alternative for testing your setup, a key differentiator in Fin Conversation Analytics comparisons.

Finally, you get full control with straightforward pricing. eesel AI’s customizable workflow engine lets you decide exactly which tickets the AI should touch and how it should handle them. And since the pricing is a flat, transparent fee, you can automate to your heart's content without worrying about a bill that spirals out of control.

Is Fin Conversation Analytics right for you?

So, what's the verdict? Fin Conversation Analytics is a solid tool for teams who are already living and breathing Intercom. It’s deeply integrated with their helpdesk, has a smart CX score that’s more than just a survey, and offers an intelligent (if a bit manual) flywheel for getting better over time.

However, its biggest strengths are also tied to its weaknesses. The per-resolution pricing can end up punishing you for being successful, the platform can feel restrictive if you aren't fully bought in, and the tools for large-scale analysis and customization could be better.

For teams who want a more nimble solution with clear costs, more control, and the freedom to use their existing tools, a more flexible platform might be the way to go.

If you’re looking for an AI solution that adapts to your workflow (not the other way around), gives you transparent pricing, and lets you test everything with confidence, give eesel AI a try for free.

Frequently asked questions

Fin Conversation Analytics is a suite of features woven into Intercom's broader AI platform, not a standalone product. It's designed to analyze customer conversations to improve both AI agent and human agent performance. ###

It uses an "Optimize" tab to group unresolved conversations by topic, highlighting common customer pain points. Additionally, its AI-driven CX Score analyzes 100% of chats for sentiment and resolution success, offering a comprehensive view of customer experience. ###

Fin can automatically draft new knowledge base articles based on how human agents successfully resolve tricky issues. However, these drafts still require a manager's review and approval before being published. ###

Common limitations include its per-resolution pricing, which can be unpredictable, and difficulties in customizing escalation rules. It also works best within the Intercom ecosystem, making integration with external knowledge sources challenging. ###

Fin uses a per-resolution pricing model, costing $0.99 per resolution with a monthly minimum. This can make budgeting unpredictable, as costs can significantly increase during periods of high support volume. ###

While Fin can integrate with some other helpdesks, its features are most deeply integrated and optimized for teams fully committed to the Intercom ecosystem. Its rigid workflows may not suit those with knowledge bases or processes outside Intercom.

Share this post

Stevia undefined

Article by

Stevia Putri

Stevia Putri is a marketing generalist at eesel AI, where she helps turn powerful AI tools into stories that resonate. She’s driven by curiosity, clarity, and the human side of technology.