Purpose: A letter from the author
If you’re here, you’re probably trying to figure out how to make Zendesk’s AI actually do something useful, and not just show up in your settings and collect dust.
We at eesel wrote this guide because Zendesk AI sounds exciting in theory, but the reality is… it’s not always clear what’s included, how much it will cost, or what it can really handle. If you’ve been on Zendesk’s help center, there are probably a million guides there and more questions left by users. Truth is, most of their guides are either too vague, too technical, or too focused on features without showing how to apply them in real support workflows.
This isn’t that, and we are not Zendesk.
This is for customer service leaders, support managers, or even unlucky agents who’ve been asked to “set up the AI thing” and are now wondering what they just signed up for (like me). We’ll break down every piece of Zendesk AI, show what it does and doesn’t do, walk you through the setup which includes pictures (because some people learn better through visual graphics), and give you real-word examples from support teams already using it.
Lastly, we’ve provided tools, documents, and honest insights along the way including where Zendesk’s AI excels, and where it falls short.
Chapter 1: A TL;DR to Zendesk AI features
Let’s start with the basics: what is Zendesk AI?
Zendesk AI isn’t a single tool. It’s a mix of automation features that can be bundled or purchased separately and all of them sit on top of your existing Zendesk plan. Unfortunately, the AI add-on isn’t available to everyone. Because not all Zendesk AI features come included with your subscription.
Here’s what Zendesk currently offers:
Plan | Monthly Price (per user) | Annual Price (per user/month) |
---|---|---|
Suite Team | $69 | $55 |
Suite Growth | $115 | $89 |
Suite Professional | $149 | $115 |
Suite Enterprise | $219 | $169 |
If you’re on Suite Professional or Enterprise, some features like triage, article suggestions, macros, and basic AI agents are already included. They’ll be available by default once you activate them in your dashboard.
The rest are locked behind the Advanced AI add-on. That includes advanced AI agents, copilots, and generative replies. You can’t access these tools unless you’ve already upgraded to a high-tier Suite plan.
So if you’re wondering why copilots or advanced bots aren’t showing up, it’s not a setup problem, it’s your plan.
Feature | Description | Availability | Key Capabilities |
---|---|---|---|
AI Agents | Bots that handle customer requests on their own (e.g., FAQs, order tracking). | Essential: Suite Team+ (limited) Advanced: Requires AI add-on |
– Simple workflows (FAQs, password resets) – Generative replies (Advanced only) – Triage, macros, routing (Advanced only) |
AI Copilot | Assists agents during live tickets with reply suggestions and article recommendations. | Requires Advanced AI add-on | – Real-time reply suggestions – Recommends next steps and help articles – Integrates with macros and knowledge base |
Intelligent Triage | Automatically tags and routes tickets based on intent, sentiment, and language. | Included in Copilot add-on (not standalone) | – Intent, sentiment, language detection – Automated tagging and routing – Operates behind the scenes |
Article Recommendations | Suggests relevant help center articles to agents and customers. | Included in all Suite plans | – Shows articles mid-ticket or chat – Works via macros or Copilot suggestions |
Auto-replies and Macros | Sends or suggests responses based on triggers; great for repetitive tickets. | Included in all Suite plans | – Sends pre-written replies – Auto-suggests based on triggers – Reduces manual response effort |
Chapter 2: Features explained
Now that you’ve had an overview of the (kinda complicated) landscape, let’s get into the nitty gritty of each of these features.
You’ve probably seen a bunch of terms agents, copilots, macros, triage, and suggestions all thrown into one big marketing scheme. But here’s what’s actually included under Zendesk AI right now.
This chapter is your working list. These are the tools Zendesk is calling “AI,” what each one actually does, and where they show up in your workflow. We’re not talking about pricing or plans here just the features themselves and how they’re supposed to help your team.
Here’s what Zendesk AI includes right now, what it’s built to handle, how it shows up in your workflow, and what kind of work it’s good for.
AI copilot supports your agents directly during live conversations. It doesn’t speak to customers, it helps human agents by drafting replies, suggesting help center articles, pulling up macros, and recommending common workflows. Basically, it cuts down on tab-switching and lets agents move faster, especially when handling high volumes of tickets.
Intelligent triage handles tickets before they hit the queue. It reads the incoming message, figures out what the ticket is about, detects the tone or urgency, and applies tags so it can go to the right person or team. It helps organize everything upfront, especially when your volume’s too high for manual sorting to keep up.
Article recommendations help both customers and agents find the right content, fast. If someone starts a chat, Zendesk can show help articles that might solve the issue before a ticket even gets created. Agents can also get suggestions mid-reply, so they don’t need to dig through the help center. This feature only really works if your content is solid but when it is, it’s a huge time-saver.
Auto-replies and smart macros take Zendesk’s classic macro system and add automation. Instead of manually applying a macro, Zendesk can suggest one or send it automatically based on what the customer said. You can also layer in conditions, tags, and custom logic. When used right, this can dramatically reduce response time for high-frequency questions.
Each of these tools solves a very specific kind of problem and they work even better when combined. Think of triage + macros to pre-sort and respond, or copilot + article suggestions to speed up agent replies without sacrificing accuracy.
Chapter 3: Understanding Zendesk AI pricing
Zendesk pricing isn’t exactly transparent. You’ll find a few numbers on their website, but when it comes to AI, it’s not always clear what you’re paying for, what’s included, or how much it’ll actually cost once your volume grows.
Zendesk AI pricing comes in layers.
Plan | Monthly Price | Yearly Price (per user/month) |
---|---|---|
Suite Team | $69 | $55 |
Suite Growth | $115 | $89 |
Suite Professional | $149 | $115 |
Suite Enterprise | $219 | $169 |
First, you pay for a Zendesk Suite subscription. If you want to use AI features, you need to be on the Professional or Enterprise plan. That unlocks some base-level functionality like article suggestions, macros, and basic AI tools.
If you want actual automation, such as AI agents that resolve tickets, copilots that assist in real time, or anything powered by generative AI, you need to purchase the Advanced AI add-on. This add-on is a flat rate per agent, billed annually.
At the time of writing, the price for the Advanced AI add-on is $50 per agent per month, charged on top of your regular Zendesk Suite subscription. And if you’re planning to use AI agents? There are separate usage costs based on how many tickets they handle
Chapter 3.1: Per-seat costs, usage thresholds, and real-world pricing examples
Once you’re on a Professional or Enterprise Suite plan, the first thing you’ll notice is that Zendesk AI isn’t bundled in you still have to pay for the Advanced AI add-on.
This add-on costs $50 per agent, per month, billed annually. It’s charged on top of your regular Zendesk Suite subscription.
Let’s say your support team has 10 agents. Zendesk Suite Professional is already $115 per agent per month. Add the AI add-on and your total per agent jumps to $165.
That brings your monthly total to $1,650, just for licenses.
But that’s not the full picture.
AI agents come with usage-based pricing. Zendesk calls this “automated resolutions” tickets fully handled by the bot, without human input. You’re charged based on how many of these are completed each month.
Here’s what Zendesk charges today:
- $1.50 per resolution if you commit in advance (volume-based pricing)
- $2.00 per resolution if you pay as you go
So if your AI agent resolves 10,000 tickets in a month, that’s $15,000 to $20,000 on top of your license fees.
This is where the numbers can get out of hand. If you don’t forecast resolution volume, your AI bill can grow faster than your actual support team.
Chapter 3.2: Be careful of hidden fees or usage traps
Even if your plan looks predictable on paper and Zendesk claims they have no hidden fees, there are a few ways to get caught off guard.
First, Zendesk charges the AI add-on per agent. No exceptions. If you have 20 agents but only 5 actually use AI tools like copilots or AI agents, you are still paying for all 20. And if you try to scale down in the middle of your term, you are locked into that number until your renewal comes around.
Second, AI usage is unpredictable. Zendesk charges for automated resolutions, which means tickets solved by bots without human involvement. That seems efficient until you hit a ticket spike. A product bug, an outage, or a seasonal rush can send usage through the roof. You might not even notice until the invoice hits.
Third, Zendesk AI tools depend heavily on your internal setup. If your macros are a mess or your help center content is outdated, the AI cannot perform well. It will suggest the wrong replies, recommend unhelpful articles, or misroute tickets. And your team will still have to fix it, even though you are paying Zendesk to automate that exact work.
Fourth, Zendesk doesn’t make it obvious which tools are turned on. AI copilots or other automation might be quietly running in trial mode. These can generate usage and costs without you realizing it. If you do not actively monitor your admin settings, things can slip through.
This is not just theory. Real teams are seeing it happen.
One company shared that their Zendesk bill climbed to $5,000 per month after growing to just a few dozen agents. That amount did not include AI tools or add-ons. When they asked about options, Zendesk support suggested downgrading their plan, which would mean losing critical features they relied on. This was posted by u/Warp_DotDev on Reddit and sparked a full thread of similar complaints, pricing workarounds, and alternative platform suggestions.
Another team said they tried to negotiate but Zendesk would not budge. They ended up switching helpdesks and saving money. Others mentioned moving their help centers off Zendesk entirely to save money, including one team that rebuilt theirs on AWS for a fraction of the cost.
Some teams have tried to reduce costs by moving internal users to Light agents or pushing conversations into Slack to avoid needing extra seats. A few switched to annual billing to bring the price down slightly. But most of these changes are workarounds, and they only delay the bigger question.
If your Zendesk bill is pushing $50,000 per year, it may be time to re-evaluate entirely. Between per-agent pricing, usage-based fees, and limited flexibility, many teams are realizing the platform just doesn’t scale well without major cost trade-offs.
Chapter 4: Setting up Zendesk AI
(Setting up and theoretical application based on what Zendesk says)
So let’s say you’ve decided to try Zendesk AI. Now what?
Well, this chapter walks you through where to find the settings, what to turn on (or ignore), who should be doing the actual setup, and the most common places things go wrong. It’s a straightforward map for support teams who want to get everything running without wasting hours clicking around.
Depending on which features you’ve activated, you’ll need to check:
- Admin Center > Bots and Automations
- Admin Center > Workspaces > Agent Tools
- Admin Center > Objects and Rules > Triggers and Macros
- Admin Center > AI Add-on (if it’s enabled)
There isn’t one central place to manage everything. You’ll need to move between sections to piece it all together.
What to click, what to skip
Here’s what to focus on first:
- Turn on AI Agent suggestions inside ticket views
- Enable Intelligent Triage (if you have access) and set up basic tagging rules
- Link your help center and make sure articles are live, searchable, and accurate
- Review your macros to see which ones are eligible for auto-replies
- If you’re using Copilot, turn on reply suggestions in the agent workspace
Skip or delay:
- Complex intent workflows unless you have a dedicated ops person
- Custom Copilot prompt tuning unless your team already works with LLMs
- AI article drafting unless your help center is already in great shape
Who should do the setup
This is not a one-click setup. It is also not something you want to assign to an agent in between tickets.
The setup should be owned by someone who understands your Zendesk environment from top to bottom. In most teams, that will be your support operations lead or platform administrator. They need to know how your tickets flow, how macros are structured, how triggers interact, and whether your help center content is even usable.
You do not need a developer to turn on Zendesk AI, but you do need someone who can think in systems. Someone who can map out the dependencies, anticipate what might break, and make smart decisions about what should and should not be automated.
If your workflows are already messy, AI will not fix them. It will just make the mess run faster. AI only works when it is built on top of something solid. If your foundation is shaky, the automation will collapse under its own weight.
A checklist to follow
[Downloadable or shareable checklist]
Chapter 4.1: What it looks like when it’s working
If everything is set up right, AI starts doing a few very specific jobs in the background. You won’t see some flashy transformation overnight. But you will notice that certain repetitive or time-wasting tasks start disappearing from your agents’ workload.
Here’s what it can handle well:
- Password resets
- Order status requests
- Shipping updates
- Refund policies or process walkthroughs
- Internal routing based on topic, tone, or language
- Help center article suggestions for common questions=
- Drafting replies for basic questions like “how do I update my payment info”
It does not solve everything, but if these make up even 20 or 30 percent of your daily volume, AI can start buying your team some breathing room.
What your agents will see
Inside the agent workspace, things start to feel a little more assisted.
- For tickets handled by AI agents, they may never touch them at all. These go from open to solved automatically.
- For everything else, agents will see suggested replies, recommended articles, or macros that are context-aware.
- Some agents will use these tools. Others will ignore them, especially if the suggestions feel generic or irrelevant.
You might need to train your team to trust the AI over time, especially if it fumbles in the beginning.
How it changes the day-to-day
The biggest shift is in the type of work your team handles. You’ll know it’s going great if your AI is working properly, and your team starts spending less time on “Where is my order” and more time on escalations, bugs, and emotionally charged tickets.
It is not going to eliminate your need for human agents. But it should reduce the volume of simple, high-frequency tickets that slow everything down. Your team will also spend more time reviewing and fine-tuning workflows. This is not set-it-and-forget-it tech. AI needs maintenance.
Chapter 4.2: How to know if it’s helping or just in the way
Just because Zendesk AI is turned on doesn’t mean it’s working. Some teams flip the switch, see a few suggestions pop up, and assume it’s fine or probably working. Others find out a month later that none of it actually helped, or worse, it gave you more work.
This chapter covers how to tell the difference. Not based on what Zendesk promises, but based on what shows up in your queue.
What to look at
There are a few core metrics that tell you if the AI is pulling its weight:
- Response time – Are customers getting replies faster, especially for basic questions?
- Tickets solved per agent – Has that number gone up? If not, why?
- Repeat issues – Are customers reaching out again because the AI gave the wrong answer?
- Manual intervention – Are agents overriding suggestions more than they’re using them?
These are signs that something is either working well, or not working at all.
Where to find the data
Most of this lives in Zendesk Explore. If you have it enabled, start with a basic report that tracks:
- Time to first response
- Number of tickets solved with AI agent involvement
- Number of tickets closed without human input
- Macro usage or AI suggestions accepted by agents
If you don’t have Explore set up, start smaller. Just watch the ticket queue. Ask agents if they’re using the suggestions. Pull a few examples and look at what the AI recommended versus what actually got sent.
You can get a decent read on performance without needing a dashboard right away.
How long to wait before judging
Do not judge Zendesk AI based on the first day. It takes time to gather enough activity to see real patterns.
Within the first week, you should start seeing reply suggestions and basic automations triggering. By week two or three, you should know if it’s reducing effort or just making things messier. After 30 days, you should know whether it’s worth keeping or scaling back.
If you’re not seeing measurable improvements by the end of the first month, something’s off. Either the content is bad, the setup is broken, or the tool just isn’t helping your workflow.
Chapter 4.3: What it’s bad at
Zendesk AI can handle a lot, but it also gets a lot wrong. And when it does, the damage isn’t always obvious right away. You’ll notice the impact later when customers get frustrated, when agents start ignoring suggestions, or when your ticket queue gets messier instead of cleaner.
When it sends the wrong message
AI is only as good as the rules, macros, and content it pulls from. If your macros are outdated or your help center articles are vague, the AI will push out replies that are flat-out wrong.
This can look like:
- Giving refund instructions that no longer apply
- Recommending an article that has nothing to do with the actual issue
- Sending a reply that skips key context and causes confusion
And once that message is sent, the damage is done. The customer now has bad info, and your agent has to step in and clean it up.
When it doesn’t understand tone
AI doesn’t read the room. It can’t tell the difference between sarcasm, urgency, or emotional tone. If a customer is angry, grieving, or just trying to be funny, the AI will treat it the same way as a password reset.
This can lead to:
- Tone-deaf replies in sensitive conversations
- Escalations that should have been handled carefully from the start
- Agents needing to undo the damage caused by robotic or insensitive responses
There’s no emotion filter “for now”. It does what it’s told, whether or not it should.
When it just doesn’t help
Sometimes the AI is just… there. Sitting in the corner of the agent workspace, suggesting replies nobody uses, tagging tickets incorrectly, or recommending articles no one clicks. And at best, it gets ignored. At worst, it slows everyone down.
You’ll know it’s not helping if:
- Agents are bypassing suggestions and writing replies from scratch
- Customers are reopening tickets because the first answer didn’t land
- You have to keep explaining to your team how to “work-around” the AI instead of letting it assist
Chapter 5: Zendesk AI in action
(Practical application based on actual use case from users)
Everything so far has covered how Zendesk AI is supposed to work. Now let’s talk about what actually happens when users or teams put it to the test. From theory to practical actual application
Overhyped results by Zendesk?
According to Zendesk, When it works, its AI speeds up your ticket queue and takes the edge off your first-response times. It makes your support system feel a little tighter, a little faster, and a little easier to manage.
But it is easy to overhype. AI will not understand sarcasm. It will not always tag things correctly. It might suggest help articles that have nothing to do with the question. You will need to watch for these misses and adjust over time.
The tools themselves aren’t broken, but they’re only as good as the workflows and content underneath them. If your macros are out of date or your help center is a mess, AI will just push the wrong answers faster.
That’s why early-stage results can be misleading. It looks like automation is working because replies are going out faster. But if those replies are off-topic or agents are fixing them afterward, you’re not saving anything.
What good results actually look like
When Zendesk AI is set up right and paired with clean content and solid workflows, it can take real pressure off your team.
Here’s what good results look like:
- Agents are handling fewer tickets manually
- Time to first response goes down, especially on common issues
- Resolution times on FAQs or order updates drop noticeably
- Suggested replies match the customer’s intent and get used without heavy editing
- Customers stop reopening tickets just to get clarification
If you’re seeing those signs, AI is doing its job. Not perfectly, not magically just in a way that actually helps. If you’re not seeing those things, chances are AI is either sitting idle or silently creating extra work
Chapter 5.1: Use cases by ticket type
Based on what support teams are actually seeing in production, here’s where Zendesk AI tends to work best:
Refund requests
AI can guide customers through the refund process by confirming order numbers, linking to policy articles, and collecting the right details upfront. It won’t issue the refund itself, but it clears a path so the agent doesn’t start from zero.
FAQs and how-to tickets
These are the easy wins. Questions like “How do I change my password?” or “Where can I view my past orders?” are perfect for automation. AI can send a macro, suggest a help article, or auto-close the ticket depending on how it’s configured.
Order status and shipping updates
When connected to your backend (like Shopify), AI agents can pull real-time shipping info and respond instantly. That saves agents from digging through orders just to tell a customer their package is in transit.
Routing based on topic, tone, or language
With triage enabled, AI can detect intent, urgency, and even emotional tone to sort tickets more accurately. That means fewer misrouted tickets, faster escalations, and less bouncing between queues.
These are the high-frequency, low-effort tickets that slow teams down. Zendesk AI won’t solve the complex stuff, but it can get the repetitive work out of the way.
Chapter 5.2: What a working integration looks like (Shopify example)
One of the clearest use cases where Zendesk AI actually performs well is with Shopify.
Ecommerce brands using Zendesk with Shopify see quick wins because the volume is high and the questions tend to be repetitive. It is the kind of environment where automation can make a noticeable difference fast.
Here is what that looks like in practice:
AI agents can respond to order tracking and shipping questions by pulling live data from Shopify. Customers get answers immediately without waiting for an agent to log in and check manually.
Refund or return requests are partially automated. The AI collects the necessary info, confirms the order, and even links to return policies. In most cases, the agent just needs to review and click approve.
Copilot helps with edge cases by drafting replies to situations like a missing package or incorrect item. Agents get a solid starting point and make small edits instead of writing from scratch.
Meanwhile, human agents spend less time answering routine tickets and more time dealing with complaints, logistics issues, or escalations.
It is not set-it-and-forget-it. You still need clean Shopify data and a clear refund process. But once the integration is solid, AI becomes an actual time-saver instead of just another button in the dashboard.
Before and after AI in support workflows
Before AI | After AI |
---|---|
Agents tag, route, and respond to everything | AI handles common tickets automatically |
Same FAQs get answered over and over | Macros and replies are suggested in real time |
Tickets pile up in one general queue | Triage routes tickets to the right teams faster |
Macros and help docs are underused | Copilot makes them visible and easy to use |
Response times stay slow, even on simple issues | First response time drops without adding headcount |
Agents feel stuck in repetitive work | Agents focus on escalations and edge cases |
Chapter 5.3: What real teams are saying
You’ve seen the features, the use cases, and the workflows. Now here’s what actually matters. These are real reviews from users who have put Zendesk AI into live support environments.
The feedback comes from public sources like Capterra and SoftwareReviews. Some of it is positive. Some of it is critical. All of it reflects what teams are really experiencing when they rely on Zendesk AI in day-to-day support.
User feedback of Zendesk AI
“It’s pretty bad honestly. We tried for 30 days, and the intent model is not built for all businesses. And it’s expensive. We are looking checking now ultimate or Jochem.ai. The only thing what worked well was the transcription feature for Zendesk talk. That should be a default feature in Zendesk professional.”
— Reddit User
Source: Reddit“Zendesk seems to be in the same boat, acquiring companies and bolting AI where it can. But I am struggling to get up to speed with it and make it useful. But when I look at some other alternatives to ZD they have much more seamlessly integrated with AI and made it all part of the interface.”
— Reddit User
Source: Reddit
“Some users find the advanced features complex and note that the platform may not be ideal for small businesses due to higher costs and steep learning curves.”
— Desku Blog
Source: Desku“Zendesk, despite receiving the highest number of reviews at 422, has the lowest average rating of 1.58 and a significantly higher number of negative reviews (354).”
— Competitors App
Source: Competitors App
Chapter 6: Measuring performance and ROI
It’s one thing to set up Zendesk AI. It’s another to prove it’s actually working. Whether your goal is faster response times, fewer manual tickets, or better customer satisfaction, you need real numbers to back up the investment.
This chapter covers what to track, how to track it, and what a good ROI looks like when AI is doing its job or not.
Key metrics
Here are the core metrics that matter when measuring Zendesk AI performance:
- CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score)
Are your customers actually happier? Watch for improvements here once AI starts resolving simpler issues faster. - FRT (First Response Time)
AI should bring this number down, especially for high-volume tickets like FAQs and status requests. - Resolution Time
Good AI speeds up overall resolution for simple tickets, freeing agents to focus on complex ones. - Ticket Deflection Rate
How many tickets never hit an agent because AI resolved them? This is where AI can drive serious ROI if your volume is high.
Chapter 6.1: How to build a baseline and measure progress
Building a baseline
Before you let AI loose, take a step back and measure what is going on right now. This is your baseline. Without it, you will not really know if things are improving.
Start by tracking:
- CSAT scores over the last 30 days
- Average first response and resolution times
- How many tickets your team handles manually vs through self-service
- What kind of tickets are taking up the most time
This snapshot will give you something real to compare to once AI is running.
Measuring progress
Check your numbers weekly at first, then monthly. Do not just look for small dips and call it a win. You want to see patterns:
- Is your deflection rate climbing steadily?
- Are agents actually spending less time on repetitive tickets?
- Are customers happier and reopening fewer tickets?
If you are not seeing these things, AI might be active but not actually helping. It might need fine-tuning or better content to work from.
Chapter 7: Zendesk AI limitations and pitfalls
By now, you’ve seen what Zendesk AI can do. But let’s be real: it is not perfect. There are limits to what the native AI can handle, and knowing these upfront will save you a lot of headaches down the road.
Here’s where teams typically hit roadblocks.
Language handling
Zendesk AI works best in English and a few widely used languages like Spanish, French, and German. But it is not great at nuance. Local dialects, slang, or mixed-language messages (which are common in markets like Southeast Asia or Latin America) often trip it up. This matters because if the AI cannot understand the intent correctly, it will route the ticket wrong or serve up irrelevant answers. That creates more work for agents, not less.
If your business serves a global audience, this is one of the first things you’ll notice. Even if the AI is technically multilingual, its quality drops fast once you step outside major languages or introduce slang-heavy customer bases.
Brand tone inflexibility
Zendesk’s AI drafts replies and suggests macros, but it does not “learn” your brand voice the way you might expect. Unless you spend time building out macros that reflect your tone and training Copilot properly, replies will sound robotic and canned. For businesses with a distinct brand voice such as fashion brands, DTC startups, or any company that prides itself on a personal fee, this can break the customer experience.
The AI isn’t bad, but it is basic. If you want tone that feels human and on-brand, expect to invest extra effort fine-tuning the language and reviewing suggestions regularly.
Context errors
This is a big one. AI looks at each ticket in isolation. It does not have full awareness of a customer’s entire history unless you specifically build workflows to surface that data. For example, if a customer writes in about a refund and then follows up later, AI may treat it as two unrelated issues. That can lead to tone-deaf replies or answers that frustrate the customer by repeating what they already know.
This lack of broader context also makes AI weaker in B2B support or with VIP customers, where history matters. If your team relies on deep customer context to solve problems well, AI may help with surface-level tasks but will need careful guardrails to avoid blunders.
Chapter 7.1 Where AI hallucinations and misclassifications happen
Zendesk AI can and does hallucinate. This means it sometimes makes things up or confidently offers a wrong answer. It also misclassifies tickets, tagging them incorrectly or routing them to the wrong team. This happens more often when:
- Your macros are too broad or outdated
- Your help center content is messy
- AI lacks clean, labeled data to learn from
One real risk here is that agents start distrusting the AI entirely. Once suggestions are wrong a few times, agents may ignore them completely, which kills any time savings. Regular audits and cleanup are essential to keep things running smoothly.
Chapter 7.2 How to build guardrails and contingency workflows
You cannot avoid mistakes entirely, but you can set up safety nets to minimize damage. Here’s what we’ve seen work well:
- Use strict fallback triggers. If the AI is unsure or hits a confidence threshold below a set number, it should route the ticket to a human immediately.
- Keep macros and help center content up to date. AI is only as good as the data behind it. Outdated content leads to bad suggestions.
- Regularly audit AI performance. Spot-check tickets weekly in the early months to catch problems before they scale.
- Train agents to recognize when AI is helpful and when to override it. The goal is for agents to trust AI as a support tool, not a replacement for judgment.
In the end, Zendesk AI can be a valuable helper, but it is not magic. It needs attention, maintenance, and a clear plan to keep it running smoothly. Think of it like a new hire who is fast and eager but still learning the ropes. When managed well, it can save your team serious time and clear out the easy tickets. But if you expect it to handle everything on its own, you are likely to end up disappointed.
Chapter 8: Extending Zendesk with third-party AI tools
Sometimes, or honestly most of the time, Zendesk’s native AI just doesn’t cover everything you need. Zendesk knows this too. That is exactly why they have an entire marketplace filled with third-party apps and integrations. The native tools are a good starting point, but if your team is growing or your workflows are getting more complex, you’ll probably hit limits sooner than you expect.
Chapter 8.1: When Zendesk AI is not enough
Not every team needs to extend Zendesk with outside AI right away. But if you have been working with Zendesk’s native AI for a while, you will probably hit some limits. The question is not whether Zendesk AI is “bad” or “good.” It’s whether it fits your specific workflow, ticket volume, and team setup.
Here are the clearest signs it might be time to layer in a third-party AI tool.
You are spending more time fixing AI mistakes than saving time
One of the biggest red flags is when your team spends too much time correcting AI’s suggestions. If agents are constantly rewriting replies, fixing tags, or manually rerouting tickets the AI misclassified, you are not saving time, and you are adding work.
Adding a third-party AI tool with better customization or smarter routing can reduce those mistakes and let your team trust automation again.
Your knowledge base lives outside Zendesk
We touched on this earlier, but it’s worth repeating. Zendesk’s native AI pulls only from its own help center. If your most useful documentation is in Google Drive, Confluence, Notion, or even Slack, Zendesk’s AI won’t use it unless you migrate everything inside. That is not always practical.
A third-party AI like eesel AI can connect to external sources without needing you to move content around.
You are running multiple brands or departments
Native Zendesk AI gives you one main bot or automation layer across your account. That is fine for small teams, but what if you manage support for three different brands, each with its own tone, policies, and workflows? Or if you have separate teams for retail, wholesale, and VIP customers?
A third-party AI tool lets you create separate bots or flows for each use case, instead of trying to force one-size-fits-all automation.
Your AI costs are growing without better results
Remember when we broke down Zendesk’s pricing in Chapter 3? AI features are not cheap. You pay per agent, plus usage fees, even if only a few agents are really using AI day to day.
If you are paying more each month but still doing a lot of manual work or if you have to hire more agents to “support” your automation then something is off. A third-party AI with pay-per-usage pricing might scale better for your team without ballooning costs.
You want more control over tone and messaging
Zendesk’s macros work fine for standard responses, but its AI suggestions tend to sound flat unless you constantly fine-tune them. If your brand voice is casual, playful, or highly polished, native AI can struggle to match it.
[Interactive element: Tone customization/editor
- Will perform like what we have in our eesel customization dashboard
- A lead in to our free trial]
A third-party AI with built-in tone training can help replies sound more natural, consistent, and on-brand without endless manual edits.
Chapter 8.2: Comparison: Zendesk AI vs eesel AI
If you’ve been following along, you already know that Zendesk’s native AI can handle the basics. But when it comes to flexibility and deeper automation, it starts to show its limits. Luckily, third party tools such as eesel AI can provide much better capabilities.
Setup speed
Zendesk AI is quite fast to activate. Since it’s baked into the platform, you can switch on features like triage or article recommendations in your settings without much effort. But getting those features to fit your workflow takes time. You will likely need to customize macros, edit triggers, and clean up your help center content before AI starts working well.
eesel AI is quick to install too, but it skips a lot of those prep steps. It connects directly to Zendesk and your existing tools without needing you to reorganize content. Setup is no-code, so even non-technical teams can get a bot running without IT. If your knowledge base is spread across different platforms, eesel AI saves time by pulling them in automatically.
Knowledge integration flexibility
This is one of the biggest differences. Zendesk AI pulls answers and suggestions only from Zendesk’s own help center. If your docs live in Google Drive, Confluence, or Notion, then you are out of luck unless you manually migrate content into Zendesk.
eesel AI lets you connect external sources right away. It can pull data from Google Drive, Confluence, Slack, and more without needing to copy or rebuild your knowledge base inside Zendesk. This means it works with the systems your team already uses, instead of forcing you to consolidate everything.
Custom bot creation and tone control
Zendesk’s AI gives you one main bot across your account. You can tweak macros and set triggers, but you are working within a single automation layer. If you support multiple brands, products, or departments, this setup can get messy fast.
[Interactive element: Tone customization/editor
- Will perform like what we have in our eesel customization dashboard
- A lead in to our free trial]
eesel AI lets you create multiple bots. Each one can be trained on different content, use a different tone, and handle different workflows. This is useful if you’re running several brands under one Zendesk account or supporting very different customer groups.
When it comes to tone, Zendesk relies heavily on macros and manual editing to sound human. eesel AI offers tone training, letting you teach the AI how to respond in your brand voice from the start. This reduces the need for constant adjustments and keeps replies sounding consistent.
Comparison table:
Features | Zendesk AI | eesel AI |
---|---|---|
Setup speed | Quick to enable, slower to customize | Quick install, no-code, faster launch |
Knowledge integration | Zendesk help center only | Can integrate to external sources such as Google Drive, Confluence, Slack and more |
Bot flexibility | One bot for all workflows | Multiple bots for different workflows |
Tone customization | Requires manual macro edits | Built-in tone training |
Pricing | Pay-per-agent fees plus usage charges | Pay-per-interaction, more scalable |
Analytics | Basic AI metrics | Deep usage insights and reporting |
Chapter 9: What’s next for Zendesk AI
We’ve spent this guide looking at what Zendesk AI can do right now. But what’s coming next? Zendesk isn’t standing still they’re rolling out new AI features every few months, and it looks like they’re leaning harder into automation, generative AI, and “AI copilots” to assist agents in real time.
Here’s what’s already public, and what’s likely coming down the road.
Where things are headed for Zendesk
Zendesk recently announced its AI Resolution Platform, which basically bundles all their AI tools under one umbrella. If you’ve been following their product updates, this platform focuses on four main areas:
- AI agents: Bots that can handle simple tickets from start to finish, without an agent touching them.
- Agent copilot: An assistant tool that helps human agents by drafting replies, suggesting actions, and finding related articles while they’re chatting with customers.
- Knowledge graph: A system that connects info from different sources so the AI can pull from more than just Zendesk’s own help center.
- Governance controls: Tools to monitor what the AI is doing, so you don’t end up with rogue automation sending bad answers or violating data policies.
In short, Zendesk wants their AI to do more heavy lifting, not just on the customer side but also inside the agent workspace.
Trends worth paying attention to
If you zoom out beyond Zendesk, a few bigger trends are shaping the future of AI in customer service:
- Generative AI is everywhere: Zendesk isn’t alone, everyone’s adding GPT-based copilots that write drafts, summarize tickets, or fill in missing info. Expect this to become table stakes.
- Multimodal support is growing: AI tools are starting to handle not just text but images, voice, and mixed media. Zendesk hasn’t rolled this out yet in a big way, but it’s probably coming.
- AI ethics and transparency are under the spotlight: Customers and regulators want to know what the AI is doing behind the scenes. Zendesk has started adding more transparency tools, like letting admins audit what the AI suggested or tagged.
Chapter 9.1: Future-proofing your setup
Look—AI is moving fast. Zendesk’s tools today won’t look the same in two years. But there are a few things you can do now to stay ahead without locking yourself into features that might change.
- Keep your knowledge base clean: The better your content, the better any AI (Zendesk’s or third-party) will work.
- Start small and scale later: Instead of turning on every AI feature at once, focus on automating high-volume, low-risk tasks like refunds or FAQs first.
- Watch your data sources: If Zendesk AI stays tied mostly to Zendesk’s help center, consider adding a third-party AI that can pull from Google Drive, Confluence, or wherever else your info lives.
- Train your agents to work with AI: AI won’t replace them, but it changes the role. Teams that learn to collaborate with AI tools will get more value from them.
- Stay flexible: Don’t build workflows that depend on one specific AI feature. Zendesk could sunset or rebrand features (they’ve done it before). Build your automation in layers you can adjust.