The 7 best Anysphere alternatives for developer productivity in 2025

Stevia Putri

Stanley Nicholas
Last edited October 5, 2025
Expert Verified

AI coding assistants have definitely changed the game for software development. Anysphere’s Cursor editor was a big part of that, giving us a glimpse of what an AI-first coding environment could feel like. But things move fast, and now a lot of engineering teams are starting to look for Anysphere alternatives.
Maybe it’s the constantly shifting pricing models, the need for a tool that fits better into an existing workflow, or the realization that the biggest productivity drains aren’t just about writing code. Whatever the reason, the search is on.
Here’s a thought: what if writing code faster isn’t the real solution to developer productivity? What if the biggest time sinks are the endless, repetitive questions in Slack, the hunt for that one piece of documentation, and the constant stream of internal support tickets? In this guide, we’ll look at the best Anysphere alternatives that help with coding and tackle the operational clutter that really slows developers down.
What is Anysphere and why are developers seeking alternatives?
Anysphere is the company behind Cursor, which is an AI-native code editor built on top of VS Code. It basically puts large language models right into your workspace, unlocking features like AI-powered refactoring, generating code across multiple files, and chatting with your codebase. It got a lot of attention for being a powerful, self-contained solution.

That kind of uncertainty, plus a growing market of specialized tools, has pushed many developers to look for more stable and predictable Anysphere alternatives.
Our criteria for choosing the best Anysphere alternatives
To make this list actually useful, we had to look beyond just code completion. We judged these tools on how they improve the entire engineering workflow, not just one part of it. Here’s what we cared about:
-
Core AI capability: Does the tool actually do its main job well, whether that’s writing code, running tests, or managing knowledge?
-
Workflow integration: Does it slide into the tools your team already uses (VS Code, GitHub, Slack, Jira) without a fuss, or does it try to lock you into its own world?
-
Ease of setup and use: How fast can you get your team up and running? Is there a long sales process, or can you just sign up and go?
-
Team-wide productivity: Does it only help one developer at a time, or does it unblock the whole engineering team and maybe even the support folks?
-
Transparent pricing: Is the pricing clear and predictable? Can you scale up without getting hit with surprise bills?
A quick comparison of the top Anysphere alternatives
Tool | Primary Use Case | Ideal For | Pricing Model | Standout Feature |
---|---|---|---|---|
eesel AI | Internal knowledge & support automation | Reducing developer interruptions | Per interactions (flat-rate tiers) | AI chat in Slack/Teams |
GitHub Copilot | AI code completion & generation | Teams invested in the GitHub ecosystem | Per user, per month | Deep integration with GitHub repos |
Tabnine | Enterprise AI code completion | Large teams with strict security needs | Per user, per month | On-premise deployment & custom models |
Replit Ghostwriter | Collaborative, browser-based coding | Education, prototyping, and remote teams | Per user, per month (with free tier) | Zero-setup cloud development |
Amazon Q Developer | AWS-focused development | Teams building heavily on AWS | Per user, per month | Deep knowledge of AWS services |
Windsurf | AI-native IDE | Early adopters wanting an AI-first workflow | Per user, per month (with free tier) | Project-wide context awareness |
Qodo | AI-powered code testing | Teams focused on TDD and code quality | Credit-based (with free tier) | Automated unit test generation |
The 7 best Anysphere alternatives for engineers in 2025
Let’s dive into the details. Here’s our breakdown of the best tools to check out if you’re thinking of moving on from Anysphere’s Cursor.
1. eesel AI
Most of the tools on this list help you write code. eesel AI is different, it helps you eliminate the distractions that pull you out of your code. Senior devs spend a shocking amount of time answering the same questions in Slack or searching through outdated wikis. eesel AI fixes this by becoming an AI support agent for your internal teams.
A screenshot of the eesel AI agent answering a question directly within Slack, showing how it reduces developer interruptions.
You just connect it to your knowledge sources, like Confluence, Google Docs, and your history in Slack. From then on, it gives instant, correct answers to questions from the product team, support agents, or junior devs, right inside the apps they already use. This lets your most experienced engineers get back to solving hard problems instead of acting as a human help desk.
-
Pros:
-
You can get it live in just a few minutes, no sales call required.
-
It works directly in Slack and MS Teams, so there’s no new app to learn.
-
It pulls knowledge from dozens of sources, not just one help center.
-
-
Cons:
-
It’s not a code editor; its purpose is to automate knowledge and support.
-
It’s most valuable for teams that know communication bottlenecks are killing their productivity.
-
-
Pricing: eesel AI’s pricing is based on how many AI interactions you use each month, which keeps costs predictable. All plans come with the full suite of products (Agent, Copilot, Triage).
-
Team Plan: $239/month (billed annually) for up to 1,000 AI interactions per month.
-
Business Plan: $639/month (billed annually) for up to 3,000 AI interactions, plus features like training on past tickets and AI actions.
-
Custom Plan: For unlimited interactions and other enterprise needs.
-
-
Why it’s on the list: It’s a fresh take on developer productivity that solves the collaboration friction that coding assistants simply can’t touch.
2. GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is probably the most direct competitor to Cursor and the natural first stop for anyone looking for Anysphere alternatives. Since it’s made by GitHub, its connection to your repos, pull requests, and issues is unbeatable. It gives you smart, context-aware code suggestions and can help with anything from boilerplate to entire functions. Its agent features are also getting better, letting you ask for complex changes in plain English.
-
Pros:
-
Incredible integration with the GitHub ecosystem.
-
Works really well across tons of different programming languages.
-
It’s backed by Microsoft and OpenAI, so you know it’s not going away anytime soon.
-
-
Cons:
-
Not as useful if your team doesn’t use GitHub.
-
It can sometimes suggest code snippets from its training data that are outdated or insecure.
-
-
Pricing: GitHub Copilot’s pricing is a straightforward per-user fee.
-
Free: $0/month with limits of 2,000 completions and 50 agent/chat requests per month.
-
Pro (Individuals): $10/month or $100/year for unlimited use and access to better models.
-
Business: $19/user/month, which adds policy management and IP indemnity.
-
Enterprise: $39/user/month for personalized suggestions based on your codebase.
-
3. Tabnine
For big companies with tight security or compliance rules, Tabnine is a seriously powerful option. Its main selling point is flexibility. You can run Tabnine’s AI models on-premise or in your own private cloud, which means your source code never has to leave your control. On top of that, you can train Tabnine on your internal codebases so it learns your team’s specific styles and private libraries.
-
Pros:
-
On-premise and VPC options give you maximum security.
-
You can train custom models on your private code.
-
It supports a wide range of IDEs.
-
-
Cons:
-
It’s more of a lift to set up compared to cloud-only tools.
-
The enterprise features don’t come cheap.
-
-
Pricing: Tabnine’s pricing is geared toward professional teams.
-
Dev Preview: A free 14-day trial to test everything out.
-
Dev: $9/month. This gets you AI chat, foundational agents, and basic personalization.
-
Enterprise: $39/user/month (billed annually). This includes everything in Dev, plus private deployment options, context from your full codebase, custom models, and IP indemnification.
-
4. Replit Ghostwriter
Replit Ghostwriter is designed for a completely different workflow. It’s an AI coding assistant that lives inside Replit’s browser-based IDE. This makes it incredibly easy to start a project, you don’t have to install anything locally. It’s perfect for quick prototypes, learning a new language, or collaborating with teammates in real time. Ghostwriter can generate code, explain tricky parts, and help you refactor.
-
Pros:
-
Zero local setup. Everything just works in your browser.
-
Amazing for real-time pair programming.
-
Great for educational use or spinning up a quick project.
-
-
Cons:
-
You obviously need a stable internet connection.
-
Probably not the right fit for huge, complex projects that need a local IDE.
-
-
Pricing: Replit’s AI features are part of its core plans.
-
Starter: Free, with a limited trial of the Replit Agent.
-
Replit Core: $20/month (billed annually). You get full access to the Replit Agent, private apps, and better hardware.
-
Teams: $35/user/month (billed annually). This adds centralized billing and more computing power.
-
5. Amazon Q Developer
If your team is all-in on AWS, then Amazon Q Developer is an alternative you should look at. It’s an AI assistant that has been trained on a massive amount of AWS documentation, best practices, and APIs. It doesn’t just help you write code for services like Lambda and S3; it also gives you tips on how to improve performance, cut costs, and fix security issues tied to your AWS setup.
-
Pros:
-
It has expert-level knowledge of the entire AWS world.
-
It can scan for security issues and suggest optimizations.
-
It plugs into popular IDEs and the AWS console itself.
-
-
Cons:
-
It’s way less useful for teams that aren’t building on AWS.
-
It can be more focused on infrastructure code than general application logic.
-
-
Pricing: Amazon Q Developer keeps it simple with two tiers.
-
Free Tier: Gives you code suggestions in your IDE and limited access to its advanced features.
-
Pro Tier: $19/user/month. This unlocks everything, including codebase customization and higher usage limits.
-
6. Windsurf
Windsurf, which was recently acquired by the team behind the Devin AI agent, is a complete reimagining of the IDE. Instead of bolting AI onto an existing editor, they built it from the start as an AI-native platform. It’s particularly good at understanding the context of your entire project, which lets it handle complex, multi-file changes and bug fixes with very little guidance. This is a tool for developers ready to fully commit to an AI-driven workflow.
-
Pros:
-
It was designed from the ground up for AI development.
-
It’s great at keeping context across a whole codebase.
-
It’s backed by a team on the cutting edge of AI agent research.
-
-
Cons:
-
You have to adopt a whole new IDE and workflow.
-
Since it’s a newer tool, the community and extension library are smaller.
-
-
Pricing: Windsurf’s pricing is based on credits.
-
Free: $0/month for 25 prompt credits.
-
Pro: $15/user/month for 500 prompt credits.
-
Teams: $30/user/month for 500 credits per user, plus admin features.
-
Enterprise: Custom pricing that comes with 1,000+ credits per user and advanced deployment options.
-
7. Qodo
Qodo (you might have known it as CodiumAI) comes at the problem from a different angle. Instead of helping you write features, it specializes in writing high-quality tests for them. For teams that do test-driven development (TDD) or just want better test coverage, Qodo is a huge time-saver. It looks at your code, figures out what it does, and generates meaningful unit tests to help you ship more reliable software.
-
Pros:
-
It automates the often boring task of writing tests.
-
It helps improve your overall code quality and reliability.
-
It works as an extension in popular IDEs.
-
-
Cons:
-
It doesn’t write general-purpose code for you.
-
Its value is really for teams that already have a strong testing culture.
-
-
Pricing: Qodo uses a credit-based system.
-
Developer: Free, with 75 credits per month.
-
Teams: $30/user/month (billed annually) for 2,500 credits. This adds better PR reviews and automated learning.
-
Enterprise: Custom pricing for the whole platform, including on-premise options and priority support.
-
This video provides a beginner's tutorial on Cursor, the AI-native code editor from Anysphere, to give context on the tool this article provides alternatives for.
How to choose the right Anysphere alternatives for your engineering team
So, with all these options, how do you actually pick one? It all comes down to identifying your team’s biggest bottleneck.
-
If your bottleneck is writing code faster… then a direct code assistant like GitHub Copilot or Tabnine is probably your best move. They live right in your editor and speed up the moment-to-moment work of coding.
-
If your bottleneck is security and compliance… an enterprise tool like Tabnine is the way to go. It gives you the control needed to use AI without exposing proprietary code.
-
If your bottleneck is developer interruptions… you’ve found the hidden productivity killer. When your senior engineers are constantly being pulled away to answer questions, the entire team slows down. A tool like eesel AI automates that internal support, giving your developers their focus back. It’s a perfect complement to a coding assistant.
Beyond coding: The future of Anysphere alternatives and developer productivity
The growing search for Anysphere alternatives shows that the market for AI developer tools is finally growing up. Writing code is a huge part of a developer’s job, but it isn’t the only part. Real productivity comes from optimizing the whole system: coding, collaborating, testing, and sharing what you know.
The best AI strategy looks at the complete picture. While a tool like GitHub Copilot might make you a faster typist, a platform like eesel AI makes your entire organization faster by making sure information gets where it needs to go, without derailing your most important work.
Ready to stop answering the same questions over and over? Try eesel AI for free and build an AI assistant on your team’s knowledge in minutes.
Frequently asked questions
Developers are often looking for Anysphere alternatives due to frequently changing pricing models, the desire for tools that integrate better with existing workflows, or a need to address broader productivity challenges beyond just writing code. Many teams seek more predictable and stable solutions.
To choose the right Anysphere alternatives, identify your team’s biggest bottleneck. If it’s coding speed, focus on code assistants. If it’s security, look for enterprise-grade solutions. If it’s developer interruptions and knowledge sharing, consider tools like eesel AI.
Absolutely. Many teams find success by combining different Anysphere alternatives. For example, using a code assistant like GitHub Copilot for coding alongside a knowledge automation platform like eesel AI for internal support can significantly enhance overall productivity.
No, not all Anysphere alternatives solely focus on code generation. While some, like GitHub Copilot, excel at coding assistance, others, such as eesel AI, address productivity by automating knowledge sharing and reducing developer interruptions, optimizing the broader engineering workflow.
Yes, many of the listed Anysphere alternatives offer free tiers or trial periods. GitHub Copilot, Replit Ghostwriter, Amazon Q Developer, Windsurf, and Qodo all provide free access or trials to allow you to test their features before committing to a paid plan.
For large enterprises, Anysphere alternatives like Tabnine offer significant benefits, including on-premise deployment options, custom model training on private codebases, and robust security features. This ensures code never leaves your control and adheres to compliance standards.